Freud's Feminism

Elinor 2022-03-19 09:01:03

Freud's Feminism.

SIDE A
Alignment: Any None-Lawful
Heroine: Class: Psychoanalyst/ Cooker
Skills: Diplomacy
Knowledge (herbs, exotic religion)
Feats: Epic Chocolate Cooking
Old Woman: Class: Wizard
Female: Class: Thief
Skills: Sleight of Hand
Move Silently
Male Protagonist: Class: Ranger/ Bard
Boy: Class: None
Feats: Epic Drawing

SIDE B
Alignment: Lawful Good
Male: Class: Paladin
Male: Class: Cleric
Male: Class: Fighter

SIDE C
Passers-by A, B, C, D, etc.

SIDE A and SIDE B fight. To fight for SIDE C, of ​​course.
Who will win?

Side A has a psychoanalyst, the treatment is psychoanalysis, and there's the Rorschach test (did you see that spinning colorful plate?), and it's complemented by medication - a special herbal blend of chocolate, and also Good at diplomacy. He successfully attracted a wizard and a thief and became the backbone of the A force.
Side b was a little vulnerable, and the ascetic rule made them lose almost all the votes of side c.
At this time, the ranger appeared, intensifying their conflict.
side b has seen political failure, fighter has managed side a alone, and ranger is vulnerable.
The Paladin was angry, after all, he was still lawful and good, and expelled the fighter.
The old witch is also dying, side a hopeless, on the verge of dissolution.
The thief proposes a plan, the heroine mixes herbal chocolate, the thief prescribes the medicine, which eventually leads to the mutiny of Paladin.
Side b was completely disintegrated.
Ranger/bard returns, reunion, over.

Conclusion:
Politically, it is not abstinence, autocracy, or power that can truly rule the people powerfully.
Rather, it proposes a theory, right or wrong is secondary, the key is to make people believe and be self-satisfied.
The more powerful political means are psychoactive substances. Drug dependence is greater than anything else.
How can a woman be independent? And finally still be socially acceptable. rather than a complete independence beyond society.
The heroine gave a good answer, Legendary Cooking, but this is only superficial, and its inner deep reason is psychoanalysis. for that small town. . . . Unleash their libido. . . . Fully in line with Freud's theory. Release their suppressed subconscious.
As for inkblot tests and drugs, they are nothing more than accessories to reinforce this psychoanalytic theory.
In fact, the most bizarre thing is that the person who came to liberate sexual repression is actually a woman in the end? whatever.
Tag this film:
Feminist Freud

View more about Chocolat reviews

Extended Reading
  • Norval 2021-12-30 17:20:21

    When I was a child, when I bought the first DVD at home, I scanned the discs everywhere and saw this movie, but I only left the impression of a beautiful girl and a warm little kitchen. Looking at it for many years, it really feels different. A line feels like "It's hard to be different." People often want to change but lack the courage to bear the consequences of the change.

  • Mara 2021-12-30 17:20:21

    Look at johnny, look at johnny

Chocolat quotes

  • Armande Voizin: "Will she never have done, then, That ghoul queen of a million dead bodies? I see myself again, skin rotten with mud and pest, Worms in my armpits and in my hair." It's perfectly wretched, isn't it?

    Luc Clairmont: Perfectly.

  • Vianne Rocher: You've never really told me what the problem is - between you and Caroline.

    Armande Voizin: 'Cause it's none of your damn business. I'm an embarrassment to her. I swear. I read dirty books. I eat and drink what I like. And sin of sins, I refuse to go to Les Mimosas.

    Josephine: When I was a kid, we called it Le Mortoir. It's a nursing home for old... It's in Toulouse.

    Armande Voizin: Caroline loves the thought of a nurse with a clipboard recording my bowel movements.