wanted to talk about the contradiction and complementarity of science and religion, but turned the film into a superficial RPG puzzle game. If I hadn't played Azada and Mystery Sight well, I might have found this movie a little more fun. Because in addition to the entertainment that is left, it can't dig out the depths of religion at all.
I've been avoiding religious stuff because it's too complicated. This vast system supports the beliefs of billions of people because it integrates history, philosophy, art, politics, humanities and science. It becomes impure because of someone's idealism, and mysterious because of taboos.
There are too many loopholes and unclear explanations in the film, too many sloppy plot points, if the storytelling is really good enough, then this film should be made at least four hours. But the reality is that it is a level to still be able to make such a rough film in two hours. Might as well keep the puzzles simple, but dig a little deeper.
Tom Hanks has inertia in deciphering symbols, and puzzles are no longer puzzles under his familiar annotations. The Bible, or sculpture, has become a cipher filled with ciphers.
What is antimatter? The neutron experiment became fresh fish, cut into such a meaningless prop. Worse than nuclear weapons, is science used to destroy religion, or to sublimate it? I think Patrick played by Ewan, the argument is just here.
I've been told that Dan Brown is a fake Freemason. For me, who doesn't even know what Freemasonry is, it's better to collect information obediently.
in the name of God.
Amen.
View more about Angels & Demons reviews
