boiled water

Darron 2022-03-15 09:01:02

Yesterday, July 1st was the premiere, but yesterday was Canada's National Day, so I went shopping.
So today I chose twelve o'clock at noon. At this time, people go to school, go to work, and there are very few people in the cinema. Half an hour in advance, choose the best location.

It's hard to say, I wasn't disappointed, I didn't expect much. But it also just didn't make me fall asleep at the level. That's all, I just saw the huge score of 8 points on IMDB ~ let me sweat.

To be honest, watching movies is usually tricked into by the trailer. For example, Nicolas Cage's "Knowing" is a really bad movie. And "Public Enemies" is just the super attraction of Johnny Depp and Kristin Bell. Thanks to the gossip around the world, Johnny Depp has become the most stylish man. Personally, I don't like Johnny Depp, I prefer Christian Bale.

When I saw the director of this movie, I was really disappointed. Because the director's work is "Miami Vice", and from the trailer, it seems that the style is consistent with "Miami Vice", using a lot of pictures with large depth of field, which looks more documentary style, which is a bit harsh. Home small DC style. The camera kept shaking. But these are not flaws, it's just that the damn plot is so bland.

Let me put it simply: Depp rescued a few accomplices from prison, and then ganged up on the crime, robbing banks in Chicago in a row. Then he met the heroine Cotillard (last year's Oscar winner). After being wanted by the country, he was forced to separate from the heroine. Then, because he ticked off with the heroine and said that he would take care of him for the rest of his life, he returned to Chicago with his girlfriend despite the danger. Reunited, and then was beaten to death in front of the theater.

This is generally the case, the details are different. Watching this film is like moving Batman "The Dark Knight" to Chicago in 1930. It is a pity that Depp is not so smart and strong, and Bell does not have many high-tech weapons. The whole story is just plain water. The only thing that struck me was how tragic and romantic it was at the end.

In terms of performance, the expressions of the two are as flat as Bai Kaishui. Depp wore small round sunglasses from beginning to end and pursed his lips. Really handsome and very personable, but that's about it. Bell was sullen from beginning to end, not laughing and scolding, the only difficult expression was that he looked at his incompetent colleague with anger and full of tears.

This is definitely the worst movie the two have performed in so many years.

Details:

The love between Depp and Cotillard is so steadfast. But the portrayal of their relationship in the film is so sparse and unconvincing. The painless bed scene didn't even take off the clothes. What kind of love can make Depp risk his life to return to Chicago and Cotillard to chase the old dream? Sorry not to explain.

John Dillinger, played by Depp, was driving through the city in a police car when he was arrested, and people were waving at Depp like a star, WHY? Depp is not a hero who robs the rich to help the poor, he is just a good robber who does not harm innocent people, so popular with the public? The film does not explain. Maybe Americans have watched too many movies, as long as there are legendary people, they may think it is cool, maybe I am civilized and can't understand the cultural thinking of the American people.

Bell's role is even more prosaic, based on the task of arresting Depp in the office and making his wise decisions. And nothing more than the woman who sent someone to watch Depp, and his stupid men let the woman slip away.

I only gave two stars, if not for the two superstars + Oscar queen. I will only give you one star. Because for such a strong publicity film, such a result is really unacceptable. It's like you put Tom Hanks + Tom Cruise in a movie like "Scream".



My review of this movie may be harsh, but this is what I really thought after watching it. I'm just curious as this director failed so badly last time on "Miami Vice", what gave the production company the courage to keep him as director of "Public Enemies"? Maybe he didn't shoot badly, but the editing was too bad.

Well, the soundtrack for this movie is still good.

I was wondering what it would be like if this movie was made by Martin Sikosas?


View more about Public Enemies reviews

Extended Reading
  • Zelma 2022-03-24 09:01:21

    The love is so deep...

  • Davonte 2022-03-22 09:01:18

    I'm a sucker for shaky camera/period pieces.love the film walking the thin line between romanticized&realistic depiction of gangsters

Public Enemies quotes

  • [Purvis and Baum are listening in on a wiretapped call]

    Agent Carter Baum: This is a phone conversation from a car dealership twenty-seven minutes ago. Harry Berman.

    [He pushes down the needle to play back an acetate disk]

    John Dillinger's voice: When you drop it, leave the keys on the floorboard.

    Harry Berman's voice: I got a DeSoto.

    John Dillinger's voice: Okay.

    [Purvis takes off his headphones]

    Melvin Purvis: How did we get to Berman?

    Agent Carter Baum: Off the Dillinger coat. The coat was bought in Cicero, Illinois, a few doors down from Berman's dealership. Now we know Berman. He's been supplying cars to the Syndicate since Capone. When Dillinger bought that coat, he must've been at Berman's switching cars.

    Melvin Purvis: Soon as they call to drop the DeSoto, we'll tail it. I want men on this, around the clock.

  • [Hoover is at a Senate Appropriation Committee hearing]

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: Why do we need this?

    J. Edgar Hoover: Because criminals flee in fast automobiles across state lines, thereby defeating local jurisdiction because there is no federal police force to stop them.

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: By my tally, your bureau wants to spend more taxpayer's dollars catching crooks, than what the crooks you catch stole in the first place.

    J. Edgar Hoover: Well that's ridiculous. The Bureau has apprehended kidnappers and bank robbers who have stolen up to and in excess of...

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: Really?

    [Hoover stops midsentence]

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: How many have you apprehended?

    J. Edgar Hoover: We have arrested and arraigned 213 wanted felons.

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: No, I mean *you*, Director Hoover.

    J. Edgar Hoover: Well, as Director, I administer.

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: How many have you arrested, personally?

    [long pause as Hoover stares at McKellar]

    J. Edgar Hoover: I have never arrested anybody.

    [Other men in the chamber gasp in shock]

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: You've never arrested anybody?

    J. Edgar Hoover: Well of course not. I'm an administrator...

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: With no field experience. You are shockingly unqualified, aren't you, sir? You have never personally conducted a criminal investigation in the field in your life. I think you're a front. I think your prowess as a lawman is a myth, created from the hoopla of headlines by Mr. Suydam, your publicist there. Crimebuster? G-Man? You're setting yourself up as a Czar? That's running wild in my estimation.

    J. Edgar Hoover: A *crime* is what runs wild...

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: If this country requires a bureau such as yours, I question whether you are the person fit to run it.

    J. Edgar Hoover: [getting angry] Well I will not be judged by a kangaroo court of venal politicians...

    Senator Kenneth McKellar: Your appropriation increase is denied.

    [taps his gavel, signifying the end of the session; Hoover and his aides get up and leave]

    J. Edgar Hoover: Feed the following to Walter Winchell: "McKellar is a Neanderthal, and he is on a personal vendetta to destroy me." We will not contest him in his committee. We need to fight him on the front page. Where's John Dillinger?