In-office or out-of-office

Laverna 2022-03-18 09:01:04

Some insiders, those with vested core interests, will never come out of the outside world and turn a blind eye, so they will not have any unease; some insiders, those with vested marginal interests, are better than others. You may find your conscience to walk out, and then under pressure to drift away from the rules of the bureau;
some outsiders, the matter has been suspended high, never enter the bureau, occasionally swear at some bureaus, but it is irrelevant; some outsiders, From the beginning to the end, they pay attention to and supervise the bureau, challenge the unspoken rules to expose the insider, but also see the truth from the fog; of
course, in more cases, the insiders and the outsiders cross each other and influence each other. Attack, and the flood will be overwhelming...
Insider or Outsider, choose your own.

After watching the movie, I realized a few points:
1. When the wife found out that her husband was unemployed, she started crying and complaining about the welfare insurance, the house, the car, and the car. It did not comfort her husband's loneliness at all. Should such a wife continue to live in Together, let's just get on with it...
2. Not to mention that there is no freedom of speech or press, the system is important or the people who make the system are more important. Whether there are policies above and countermeasures, what do you do...
3. In this society, since there are fewer and fewer people like you, and there are fewer and fewer people like me, we should keep our promises and cherish each other. More and more people like us...

View more about The Insider reviews

Extended Reading
  • Diego 2022-03-25 09:01:07

    The two-and-a-half-hour version I watched was so procrastinating that I wanted to fall asleep at one point. The subject matter is very valuable for discussion. Since ancient times, fighting against power has been an extremely difficult and painful thing for ordinary people.

  • Elsie 2022-04-23 07:01:45

    Professional ethics and public interest The power of one's personality The moral status of the whole society is very profound, but why is it so procrastinated? The movie is still controlled to two hours long

The Insider quotes

  • Lowell Bergman: [Kluster demands that Wigand's interview be censored into an alternate version] I'm not touching my film.

    Eric Kluster: I'm afraid you are.

    Lowell Bergman: No, I'm not.

    Eric Kluster: We're doing this with or without you, Lowell. If you like, I can sign another producer to edit your show.

    Lowell Bergman: Uh, since when has the paragon of investigative journalism allowed LAWYERS to determine the news content on 60 Minutes?

  • Mike Wallace: You heard Mr. Sandefur say before Congress that he believed nicotine was not addictive.

    Jeffrey Wigand: I believe Mr. Sandefur perjured himself because I watched those testimonies very carefully.

    Mike Wallace: All of us did, and it was this whole line of people, whole line of CEOs up there, all swearing.

    Jeffrey Wigand: Part of the reason I'm here is that I felt that their representations clearly misstated - at least within Brown and Williamson's representation - clearly misstated what is common language within the company: "We are in the nicotine delivery business."

    Mike Wallace: And that's what cigarettes are for.

    Jeffrey Wigand: A delivery device for nicotine.

    Mike Wallace: A delivery device for nicotine. Put it in your mouth, light it up, and you're gonna get your fix.

    Jeffrey Wigand: You're gonna get your fix.

    Mike Wallace: You're saying that Brown and Williamson manipulates and adjusts the nicotine fix not by artificially adding nicotine but by enhancing the effect of nicotine through the use of elements such as ammonia?

    Jeffrey Wigand: The process is known as "impact boosting". While not spiking nicotine, they clearly manipulate it. There was extensive use of this technology known as "ammonia chemistry". It allows for the nicotine to be more rapidly absorbed in the lung and therefore affect the brain and central nervous system. The straw that broke the camel's back for me, and really put me in trouble with Sandefur, was a compound called coumarin. When I came on board at B. and W., they had tried the transition from coumarin to a similar flavor that would give the same taste, and had been unsuccessful. I wanted out immediately. I was told that it could affect sales, so I should mind my own business. I constructed a memo to Mr. Sandefur indicating I could not in conscience continue with coumarin, a product we now know and we had documentation was similar to coumadin, a lung-specific carcinogen.

    Mike Wallace: And you sent the documents to Sandefur?

    Jeffrey Wigand: I sent the documents forward to Sandefur. I was told that we would continue to work on a substitute but we weren't going to remove it as it would impact sales, and that was his decision.

    Mike Wallace: In other words, you were charging Sandefur and Brown and Williamson with ignoring health considerations consciously?

    Jeffrey Wigand: Most certainly.

    Mike Wallace: And on March 24th, Thomas Sandefur, CEO of Brown and Williamson, had you fired. And the reason he gave you?

    Jeffrey Wigand: "Poor communication skills."

    Mike Wallace: And you wish you hadn't come forward? You wish you hadn't blown the whistle?

    Jeffrey Wigand: Yeah, at times I wish I hadn't done it. There were times I felt compelled to do it. If you ask me would I do it again, do I think it's worth it? Yeah, I think it's worth it.