I remember that at a young age, those who loved us made the choices they thought were right for us, but unfortunately caused lifelong regrets. Is it because what you can't get is always the best?
Just imagine, if they eloped at the beginning, and the girl accompanies the poor boy to wander the world, like all ordinary living beings, would it be good?
In the love of different classes, honor and love are like fish and bear's paw. Because the heart is ashes, it is possible to reinvigorate and develop a career. Only pain can restrain emotions and turn them into the source of creation.
Perhaps, enough is the best ending.
A few years later, when he returned to his hometown with golden clothes and jade food, it was a pity that things were right and wrong, and he couldn't help but feel sad.
In that moment of youth, the ruins are broken, only the memory will always be in the heart. It's enough to have someone in your life who loves you like this.
The literati like to indulge in such a situation of turning back and forth, joys and sorrows, to pay tribute to love. Because the process of touching a wound is also a narcissistic process.
The first time I saw it was that heartbeat.
Passionate hurts parting since ancient times, and Nakan neglects the Qingqiu Festival.
Thinking back to Gongjin's time, Xiao Qiao got married for the first time, with a majestic appearance and a long hair fan.
Now things are different from people and things are all gone. If you want to talk, tears will flow first.
How much sorrow can you have in your heart, don't have a taste in your heart. .
The story is simple and even cliché, but it still has touching penetrating power. This is about the vivid performance of the actors, the detailed depiction of flesh and blood, and the skill created by the soulful script lines.
I just remember the scene where Evert and Duo Duo were riding happily on the country road, like a gentle breeze, floating from the screen. . . Does a good movie need to be complicated and profound? I think it only needs a warm and simple story and some touching details.
Although under the pressure of mundane evaluation, I have no future in the star evaluation, but since this film was shot in 1988 or even earlier, and I watched this bowl after eating a flashy commercial blockbuster It's a movie like 'Clear Tea', so I decided to give it 4 stars without hesitation.
I just have a question, how do you differentiate between the tedious and procrastinating plot and the delicate and docile details? Is it because my heart is too impetuous or the procrastination like an old lady's foot-binding cloth is the incurable body odor of Western literary films.
[Follow-up] I
recalled this film after a while. The details were brilliant, but the main body became more and more boring the more I thought about it. Looking at my initial evaluation, the compliments were ridiculous. You really shouldn't find a balance to comfort yourself immediately after watching a bad movie. After all, there is not necessarily a mountain treasure behind the cold dish, maybe it's just a few routines.
View more about Cinema Paradiso reviews
