Lawyer's ethics, Reivew on The Devil's Advocate

I remember reading a book before. It talked about the lawyer knowing that his defendant is really guilty. Should he expose the truth or continue to defend him? In the film, the director regards him as a conflict between conscience, justice and fame and vanity. The correct practice of the lawyers mentioned in this book is to choose to defend the defender, expose the lies of the suspect, and find favorable evidence is the duty of the judicial department. For example, the female student in the film was sexually assaulted by the teacher, and the teacher should be brought to justice. Naturally, hope should be placed on the procuratorial organs. How can one expect the defendant’s lawyer to be passively sabotaged? Observing professional ethics and realizing procedural justice, although the skynet is restored and there are fish missing, it at least provides protection for future citizens to continue to get the best work of hiring a lawyer. Choosing between "conscience" and professional ethics may be a difficult problem that lawyers face every day. If there is no official standard answer, wouldn't all lawyers in the world have to struggle with schizophrenia, haha~~

In general As mentioned earlier, it is quite good to understand this movie on the premise that the director regards the above conflict as a conflict of conscience and fame and fortune. Of course, Shinto movies are not always my favorite. By the way, Satan put forward why God is always indifferent to people's sufferings. I forgot a certain reason in a movie that used the mouth of a character to comfort the theists. I forgot~

View more about The Devil's Advocate reviews

The Devil's Advocate pictures