Being a Kubrick and Spielberg hybrid, I was mentally prepared from the start for Kubrick's ruthless dissections of humanity and philosophically dry musings. So when I saw that Monica really abandoned David, although I felt chills in my heart, I continued to watch it - I was completely attracted by the name of Kubrick and believed that I would be entangled in the following - In fact, I had already watched it a bit at this time. Can't go any further, especially at the Fresh Fair where people go to great lengths to destroy robots, and I think of some gladiator clips - that's the only movie I've ever seen with my dad, and I've watched it three times - that The story has influenced itself subconsciously in a special period, about the unchangeable fate and the invincibility of the strong.
When the black market boss who really knows the truth wants to destroy David with the same cruel method and wants to take the opportunity to make a fortune, all the audiences are reluctant to believe that the child who looks like a human and knows how to beg for mercy is a robot, officially because of this kind of public opinion. Stressed, David and his robot lover escape the scene of the carnage. This arrangement undoubtedly makes every audience breathe a sigh of relief, and it is also a plot that the film must arrange. But that didn't stop him from doubting - it's a typical case of humans being fooled by appearances! I admit that all things being equal, the child will gain more sympathy - especially a child with a complete face and even a delicate face - PLUS this child also knows how to beg for mercy. So in the outburst of pity, everyone neglected to examine the truth of the scene in front of them, and also forgot their original purpose of appearing here. How ruthless and how affectionate human beings are! ! They think that they will destroy everything they have created by pretending to be God, and they are simply deceived by appearances and will not kill a good-looking boy no matter what. How great and how small are human beings! !
I read a comment just now that the reason why David couldn't be loved by his mother is that "the same kind can love each other". This made me think that although it is moot to argue about whether humans and robots can fall in love, there is something to be said about this refined proposition of "love of kindred". My general concept of love is: after meeting certain conditions, any two people are likely to fall in love. To give a simple example: in a crowd that meets a certain number of people, there will definitely be two/or more people with the same birthday. . I think falling in love is the same. 2,000 years ago, as seen in the killing fields, humans are as dependent on robots as they are - and so are the countless science fiction novels I've read, which are constantly exploiting the human imagination. Force to create more magical and almighty machines, on the other hand, a hypocritical call to preserve the original human emotions and desires - so Monica can neither live without David nor truly love him. (At the same time, her biological son is her baby no matter how selfish)
I am not sure how to understand the main line of David's unswerving search for the Blue Fairy. Perhaps for every hopeless sad child, there needs to be a light of hope - or the meaning of going down. But I always can't bear to see this kind of plot - you can say it is the last straw for the stray, or it can be understood as a white lie to the innocent - what good is it for them? From the moment David thought of the Blue Fairy, I began to fall into deep sorrow for him. Some fates are so unchangeable. The powerful force of fate makes all the pursuit of hard work lose the brilliance of the dazzling light. regret imprint. This pain is two thousand years old, and as long as I am awake, I cannot forget it.
View more about A.I. Artificial Intelligence reviews
