In less than two days of fighting, the lives of 18 American soldiers, vs. the lives of 1,000-1,500 Somalis, plus about 4,000 wounded. "Real, real...", tusk, this number is really nothing Americans can be proud of.
When the Americans died, they grinned horribly, and paid their party dues in blood. The dead Somalis are like insect-sprayed flies, and there are a bunch of submachine guns, and another bunch of them.
This kind of favoritism description of the death scene makes me confused: Who is Ridley Scott? He is not Spielberg, and he is not Michael Bay. He is a worried old English man. The old man later took pictures of the pitiful "king of heaven" to reveal the bottom of the religious war.
Scott picked up a film that was difficult to portray. There is no protagonist in the film, just a group of portraits. But this group of warriors has nothing worthy of being left in the history of the movie except for the rhetoric "We still have brothers behind". Scott can take a moment to describe each person's personality, motivation and psychological bumps, just like in "Saving Private Ryan". But he didn't. He just took a very detailed picture of how everyone was blown up.
If this film is to discourage those candidates for conscription, the director's goal has been achieved.
In the endless blood, Somali soldiers and ordinary people raised their rifles at the American Black Hawk. Does this absurd and crazy self-defense raise a secret question for the audience?
Why is it like this? Did the Americans go to "peacekeeping"?
The American soldiers in the film don't even understand. At the beginning of the film, when the hungry people were looting food under the threat of guns, they were sitting in the air with a black eagle passing by, consciously "helpless". That night, the American soldier's dinner was roast lamb.
So, I guess Ridley Scott wants to shoot two cannon fodder conflicts. In view of the media arguments of the year (the band of Brother’s enthusiastic reaction before, the We were Soldiers’ licking of the sores, and the fact that Bush and Spielberg sit firmly on the top of the propaganda department), he, as an Englishman, is really It's hard to say bluntly.
View more about Black Hawk Down reviews
