Haven't eaten pork, and you have never seen a pig run-this is not a 007

Alysha 2022-03-17 09:01:02

Let's first come to a conclusion that is not extreme, this is a movie that does not deserve to be included in the "007 series". The two so-called 007 prequels produced by Sony after the acquisition of MGM are gimmicky and claim to let everyone see a bond that is more violent, rough, more violent, and also has a lot of emotions, but in fact, this simply makes People have an evil association, that is, Daniel Carig must have hatred with Sony's senior management, and turned the world's most famous, gentle and handsome spy into a so-called "ordinary person." This change is like Marbury thinking about the future "oh, one day I will buy the New York Knicks" or you go to a Halloween party, and you open the door to see that your honest buddy is wearing a small Underpants held a hand of cards and said "show hand" to the others.


It has been 46 years since the 007 series of movies. The 007 that I saw when I was a child will always contain the charming and suave James, fragrant sex scenes, various interesting gadgets such as glasses, watches, pens, and sports cars and yachts. Sean Connery has become A certain standard, so after him, only Pierce Brosnan, who is similar to his aura, has achieved the desired success. Timothy Dalton always looks like a cold guard of the Qing Dynasty. Roger Moore is very British and very chic. But it is too long like a wrestler, not to mention that only one episode of "Breaking the Snow Mountain Fortress" allowed Sean Connery to return to Rahimby who was angry with the common people. Therefore, when Daniel Carig was announced as the new 007, the controversy and slander received were simply rare. Just like if one day, Sister Furong was announced that she would play the Guanyin Bodhisattva in the new version of Journey to the West, what would you think?


However, "Casino Royale" was successful. At least it closed a large part of "Daniel Craig Is NOT Bond", a Bond who was faster and tougher, didn't blink, loved parkour and expressed his emotions. Appeared in front of everyone.


"Quantum Crisis" is a continuation of "Casino Royale" in terms of plot and rhythm. The scene after the opening makes people feel like "Who is the director of this movie? Glass? This must be the director of "Bourne". "Ultimatum", it must be. What? Mark Foster, what the fuck? The director of "Looking for Neverland" and "The Kite Chaser" and "Stay"? "This feeling is just like the truth. It's like watching "Michael Clayton" with popcorn in your hand. After a while, you start to fight with your eyelids and think, "Why don't you sleep?" Then suddenly George Clooney showed absurd ass on the TV. Should this be understood as a study or a tribute? As a tribute, the 007 series can be said to be Byrne's grandfather. If you learn, yes, we admit that "Bourne 3" looks very cool, and the fast editing and the action design of punches to the flesh is praised as the "new action film style". But in any case, 007 is not Bourne. I don’t think the sharp action style will become a standard and mainstream. The traditional 007 shouldn’t just be running and exploding, killing and exploding, and ending abruptly.


Speaking of tribute, the POSE of the poor so-called oil drowned employee who sent Bond home when he died was undoubtedly a tribute to "Goldenfinger" (I hope I remember correctly), how weak and absurd the other plots are. Not much to say. Speaking of spoilers, it is boring, and secondly, the fun is not as good as watching a few old SODs at home, such as "The face is outside the window, the body is in the car" or. . . Of course, we can also simply think "Ah, it must be too much cut." But unfortunately, the reality is "Cut, it must have been cut, but unless it has been cut for 30 minutes, you have no other reason to explain why it is so. It’s not pretty.” Of course, you can stand on the opposite side of this article and say, “Of course Bond requires new ones. It’s always a few sets, who likes them.” Yes, it’s right to think this way, but unfortunately at least in You didn’t see anything in "Quantum Crisis". If you put aside his "007" lineage and identity and change the director's name to Michael Bay, then we can laugh and say, "Commercial entertainment, why bother to demand so much." "The question is, if you think this film is good-looking, where is it?


In any case, I will look forward to the next Bond, as his loyal fan. Special effects and fists cannot interpret the new 007. As a blue-collar Daniel Craig, there is still a long way to go. At least for now, I sincerely hope that he can be a Bond in the next episode, pick a girl and play a gun to save the United Kingdom. Rather than as it is now, the only thing that makes people feel beautiful is the translation of the literary and artistic title "The Love of Yu Wen", as well as the inexplicable mid-stage of the film edited by our great SARFT and Dominica's weird call with domestic dubbing.

View more about Quantum of Solace reviews

Extended Reading

Quantum of Solace quotes

  • James Bond: How much oil did the Americans promise you?

    M: This isn't about oil.

    James Bond: Well, that's good because there isn't any.

    M: It's about trust. You said you weren't motivated by revenge.

    James Bond: I'm motivated by my duty.

    M: No. I think you're so blinded by inconsolable rage that you don't care who you hurt. When you can't tell your friends from your enemies, it's time to go.

  • M: It'd be a pretty cold bastard who didn't want revenge for the death of someone he loved.