"007-Breakthrough Quantum Crisis"-Who are you like and who are you?

Kelsie 2022-03-15 09:01:02

The word-of-mouth is polarized, impersonal, lacking in novelty, ingenuity, and even insincere.



I don't want to say that 007 in this episode is useless. It does everything a qualified commercial film needs, but if it does not hold 007's strong brand, its mediocrity and cheapness have basically reached an embarrassing level.
Ah,

according to the photo, I said that I didn't like him until the second part of this macho style 007. It was a bit too slow to react, but I still have to say: I don't like this episode of 007.


A plot-routine, simple, not smooth.
Basically, 007 is a dream and YY of men. In the early years, it was generally used to complete several major programs: accepting tasks, acting handsome, making jokes, meeting beautiful women and soaking in them, fancy sex scenes , Dazzling high-tech, and finally exploded.
In fact, the plot of 007 shouldn't be too demanding, it's a must.

But maybe I have a problem with my IQ. The plot of this episode is simple and uninspiring in detail. It seems a bit uninteresting and boring and inevitable, but it is a bit incomprehensible, and the story is a bit unsmooth.

Orgasm seems to be everywhere, but it is just the visual splendor brought about by explosions, gunfights and fights, which disappear quickly, and there is almost no gradual emotional control and orgasm tightening. At least I feel this way. If I let it now I recalled the plot again, and I couldn't even remember any specific details.

This is the first sequel of the 007 series. This is also the same as Bowen’s trend. It is a continuation of the previous episode. Bond can't remember the girlfriend before, and then he wanted to avenge her, and then wandered around to investigate, from the town to By the sea, I ran across a lot of cities, going up and down the earth, and the start was really tough, but the IQ was not good.

The so-called villains and conspiracies in this episode are magnificent and mysterious, but the final solution is also explosive. It blows up and burns to death. Did I ask too much? The unfolded conspiracy and scenes really did not end well.

Two action dramas-exciting, shocking, following the trend, nothing new
This episode is 106 minutes. It’s a short movie, but it’s a super intensive action scene. From the beginning it was a lot of car chasing scenes, followed by the roof chase for criminals like the previous episode. Of course it was nervous and beautiful, but that scene was really too Like Byrne, there is no aesthetic novelty, so it is not very irritating.

New Bond's action design tends to be realistic. It must be clear from the early gentleman agents. Daniel is so strong that he can stretch his shirt muscles and his fist to the flesh design makes people sometimes have the illusion of watching Donnie Yen's kung fu movies. Of course, the action is far. Not so beautiful, and mostly short and neat, but the overall style is still imitating Berne, and there is still no aesthetic novelty.

This film is the most invested film in the 007 series. It can be seen that 106 minutes really condensed the essence of money. At the beginning, it crashed into countless cars. It was everywhere in the middle and destroyed everywhere, but except for the very traditional destruction explosions and gun battles. In addition, the design of action scenes and the connection of shocking scenes lack all new ideas and excitement. Looking back at the moments that left the impression in my mind, there is almost nothing that can be said and praised. This is not as good as "Keep "Call", at least the car chase and destruction scene in it is exciting and impressive.

What is the meaning of imitating the Byrne series like this? We have Byrne and die hard, we no longer need the flattering eyeballs and audio-visual efforts of a 007 that is not similar. The classics of 007 are in front, and now we have made various changes for breakthroughs. Of course, it is understandable, and it is natural to learn from the younger generation, but imitation without wisdom makes people even lack the desire to criticize.

Three characters-who is the

New Bond who continues to seek change but is superficial and superficial ?
From "Casino Royale", from the time when the macho Daniel was hired, the filmmakers of the 007 series were busy drawing a clear line from the previous Bond, and busy telling everyone not to think about the previous Bond anymore. We want to give you one. The new 007, a Bond who is no longer a gentleman, no more flirting, no heartthrob, no more romantic, no martini, or even handsome anymore.

He is tough, brave, fierce, passionate, and silent as gold, unforgettable, and full of thoughts. The plot is to restore a legendary agent to a person. He has love and emotion, and the most important thing is that he understands pain. , The film made him struggle with loss and loneliness, and wanted people to see his painful love and disability under his hard courage.

In fact, it is also full of soil. Compared with the early Bond, this Bond is going to be new, but it is nothing but because it is set in the original classic and powerful model of Bond, and it can barely be regarded as new. This bit of hard work and innovation is just like writing a doubling to 007. When you get the illusion that he is not a Bond, when you pull it out and treat it as an original, this is an ordinary to mediocre action movie. , I have already said that the plot routine is new and unsmooth without climax, and the action is completely imitated without excitement.

As for the character, Daniel Craig used his shiny blue eyes and a tough guy to create the new 007. I agree with the director’s definition of New Bond and the efforts made to interpret this definition. The image of Bond has no fan feeling and obsession. I love the tough guys of the new era even more.

But the stiffness of this new bond with all his strength and bones and intestines is really helpless, at least his pain and love did not touch me, many times it is more like posing, "I love, I was deceived, I was depressed, I am suffering.” In the process, the repressive and introverted performance lacked skill and spark, and the design of the love bridge was disappointed, sincere and delicate, so the creativity of this not-so-skilled character suddenly appeared so deliberate and superficial, and there was nothing left. A gesture of cheap.

Especially when the choreography team's imitation is beyond your control to compare this 007 with Byrne, it is simply the distance between the kindergarten and the adults.

Or it can be said that the emotional drama in 007 has never been the focus, but New Bond is not. In the first episode, the plot tells us that Bond has encountered the love of this life, and wishfully believes that the girls in this world will fall in love with such a tough guy-a tough guy who can't blink at death is innocently in love with a woman like a child. A woman who deceived and betrayed him, they repeated Bond's affection and unforgettable, vainly trying to make the heart soft and save. But since this love occupies such an important position in the film, their love and confrontation sparks must always go through some ingenious designs. Eva Green, who is dismissive of Bond girls, and Daniel, who is known to be extremely manly. , Both of them have extremely strong charms, but when they collide with each other, they are extremely depressed and mediocre. In the end, I didn't realize their deep love and the so-called golden wind and jade.

Of course, to love or not to love, to be cute or not to be cute, to be moved or not to be moved, are all personal emotions. Maybe their love has moved someone, but basically, in my opinion, the effect of this relationship is not as good as in the past. The Bond and Bond girls have excitement and freshness.

Four new 007 series-who are you?
007 has been born for more than 40 years and has successfully become a cultural brand in the film and television industry. Like Transformers, like a slam dunk, and like all the blockbuster figures, it has established its own style and has the capital for people to consume.

"Bond, James Bond." Just this sentence can consume generations for more than 40 years. People will never tire of this iron-clad Bond shuttle rain of bullets and beautiful flowers, looking at his false impeccable, chic and distinctive features. Bond is a legend, like a god, with his elements-famous cars, beauties, and fights-there are always a lot of people in the world's dreams. No matter how the times move forward, they can always touch the heart.

However, brand consumption is shackled, and there is always aesthetic fatigue. Change is the only way to go. For example, 007 that has changed its face from episode 21 is actually a bit of a dangerous move, and the boldness of the producer is to see the polarization of word-of-mouth today. Some people are attracted by freshness, some people miss the old Bond, and such 007 will become a topic, an object of controversy, and a gimmick point anyway. It will arouse curiosity and desire for discussion, and will never be abandoned from the public's field of vision. At this point, the two episodes of 007 led by tough guy Daniel are indeed successful.

But this kind of process is more like a strategy, rather than advancing. Yes, it does not repeat the old way of 007, but it holds its own brand and is imitating others. It works hard to learn from Berne, but it is embodied by its own design. , But also mediocre, it emphasizes emotional psychology, but lacks experience, and is ignored and buried.

The new generation of 007 doesn’t matter who is like or imitated, but it seems to be a question of who it is. It can’t continue and carry the brand culture because it can’t be unique, but it can create a selling point. Make 007 this entertainment product more stimulating for consumption, very good and very successful.

It's just that, as a movie fan, I feel a little stunned. I can't say that the new 007 is not my tea. I can only say that its posture and level are a bit disappointing.
However, time changes everything. Maybe in another 10 years, 007 will return to the old Bond look. At that time, the strategy of brand culture was nostalgia. People will still look forward to it. It is almost a visible way. We will participate and wait and see with a smile, but the feeling that will be changed and stimulated by the movie will no longer appear.

View more about Quantum of Solace reviews

Extended Reading

Quantum of Solace quotes

  • James Bond: How much oil did the Americans promise you?

    M: This isn't about oil.

    James Bond: Well, that's good because there isn't any.

    M: It's about trust. You said you weren't motivated by revenge.

    James Bond: I'm motivated by my duty.

    M: No. I think you're so blinded by inconsolable rage that you don't care who you hurt. When you can't tell your friends from your enemies, it's time to go.

  • M: It'd be a pretty cold bastard who didn't want revenge for the death of someone he loved.