film, she will always say: i dont know! Supplemented by his eyes flying, his head couldn't stop swaying up and down. I suspect that the person in charge of clothing is also deliberately destroying her and designing such a look for her. The trousers she wore during her escape, the crotch-free trousers with a color a bit like sesame meringue, were really eye-catching.
I watched it on Digital TV Channel 201. It was broadcast once half a year ago. At that time, I was shocked by Miss Laura's performance. I changed the channel as soon as she came out. But there were so many out there that I didn't see anything. It was replayed again last night. I thought I had to watch the whole thing this time, so I endured and watched it in general. My basic mood is that I strongly hope that the computer company will catch this grandson, so I can't be called the King of Learning! The boss of that company should lead the snake out of the hole and deceive her. Finally, when I saw the car rushing over, I thought, finally it's all right, woohoo! At the last look, it's not that it's okay, but that it's okay.
But I think actually the biggest failure of this movie is that there is too much content in it. A political satire, why add a little love story and a little thriller chase in it? A political satire, there should be a lot of space devoted to arguments and satire, but the director presented us with endless images of a two-hundred-and-five-year-old lady running around. Lost focus. The point of this movie is not to show the sweetness of the Prime Minister and Cinderella's love in "love actually" (that movie also has Laura Linney).
The second failure is that the comedy is not funny enough, and obviously they don't have as much writers as David Letterman or Jon Stewart's writers. In the joke, the joke about putting an advertisement on the suit is okay, but the joke about entering customs is almost too long. To say the joke with the most TV talk show flavor, it is the last joke that uses a blow-up doll to fill the chest (can make a squeaking sound when groping, and activate the atmosphere), which is the most fun. But is this ironic? The
third failure is that the movie is like those American teen comedies, and finally changes the key. The satire is no longer satirical, and it has changed from a satire to a main theme drama. In the end, this jester-like person resolutely gave up his presidency in order to defend the democratic system of the United States. There is also a strong liberal bias in this film. What environmental protection, what medical insurance reform, education reform, what to drive away illegal immigrants. Are both parties really rotten potatoes? In the end, the Democratic president was re-elected and "did a good second term."
View more about Man of the Year reviews
