Regarding these three names, it represents the consistent wisdom of Yiqianren et al.: Redemption is relatively popular and tense, and the word "redemption" is quite precise as a private version; Dangerous is of course the public version, although it is a bit cliché, but it is both sensational and thrilling Now, and the word "love" can be regarded as a word that tells the truth; as for "Butterfly on a Wheel", there is a line in the movie, I didn't understand it, I came back and searched, it turned out that "Butterfly on a Wheel" is a quote Eighteenth-century English poet Alexander Pope's poem, "Who breaks a butterfly on a wheel?" (who crushed a butterfly with a wheel?), refers to the time and effort spent on a trivial matter. In short, a big deal.
I have to say that this name really perfectly describes the core of the story, but using this name probably means that the box office of the movie will be bleak. .
Perhaps thanks to Conan, I have already guessed the culprit in the middle of the movie. Although I still can't guess the reason for the layout, it seems to be related to love. In the process, the wife keeps hinting to the husband, what else do you have to hide from me? Do you really love your daughter more than anything? Are you going to confess something?
The husband's performance is disappointing: he makes mistakes again and again, lacks wisdom, is either cowardly or rude, and uses one lie to cover up another lie.
Brosnan finally played a seemingly negative role. "In fact, he is a family man," which was made clear at the beginning of the film. However, Mr. 007's face is full of beards and wrinkles. Unfortunately, his wife's eyesight is not very good, so he chose a worse one to be the object of an affair - although it is an extreme presentation in a special state, the image of the male protagonist is really good. Too bad he wasn't favored in the Spartan 300.
In my opinion, the biggest splendor and failure of the film are in the ending:
Husband and wife finished the game, they lost everything, deposit, daughter, house, job, but human nature was challenged to the extreme throughout the game, everything they faced seemed to have changed, and they seemed to wake up from a dream Generally nothing changes. I also thought of this possibility shortly after the movie started. This is the most meaningful ending I expected for this movie. It lived up to my expectations. It is actually an ethical movie.
However, the truth behind the scenes is revealed. The woman's mentality is complicated and she can't stand her husband's derailment. However, the means taken are too scheming, too vicious, and it is okay to make a big fuss. Unexpectedly, however, the woman told her husband that nothing had changed and that she expected him to come back with a whole heart to her.
With a hug in the complex expression of the man, the film comes to an abrupt end, and the audience is left to judge the ending. The main axis of emotion is not revenge, but return. I really don't know how a man could be at peace, and how could a woman expect to be reunited after experiencing such a play. The purpose of so much trouble is really puzzling. If it is discussing the solution of similar incidents, this film obviously can only be a negative teaching material. No wonder some people say that this is a sample of torturing men.
After reading it, I feel that this woman is terrible, meticulous and superb in acting, but she really hit the butterfly with a wheel. I might have liked the ending better if she and Brosnan had ruined everything for the man and walked away with ease. Of course, this can only be turned into a comedy thriller from an ethical film, without so much thinking.
When did this pure entertainment film learn to make people think?
The problem is, no one should think that others are fools, that there is and only oneself can hide the sky and make it seamless. No matter men or women, leaders or pawns, I remember a saying that probably said that people don't differ too much in IQ, but it's a matter of how fast they respond.
View more about Shattered reviews
