The script of this movie is really a waste of the cast. Every actor's acting skills are remarkable, and the filming is also very eye-catching. The first 30 minutes of the plot is tight, which makes my expectations for this movie gradually increase. Can't wait to find out what happened next. Then it took a sharp turn, and I almost thought it was a substitution for the next one and a half points. The plot is procrastinating, there is really no need to refute this, right? One and a half points of the plot can be explained with half a point, and I really can't understand the necessity of the large part of the middle of the scene of escaping and dodging. I have time to show these scenes, why can't I explain the previous foreshadowing clearly, many characters seem to appear out of thin air, and then inexplicably exit the stage, forcibly adding a dementia buff. At the beginning of the conversation between the two people in the convenience store, the characters can be established in just a few sentences. The tension is full, and the characters gradually increase. I think the director's skills can't support it. Let's talk about the background of the story. If the film wants to focus on the financial crisis, the social disorder causes people to suffer, and then they take risks to resist life. I didn't feel this conflict at all. The script was too heavy on the evasive scenes, and just used a few shots and a few lines to understate the background. In other words, it is completely reasonable to say that this movie removes social contradictions and sets the background only that the teenagers in the slums cannot survive. So I don't agree with many clips that praise the background setting in many film critics. Where is the disorder? Why is it that the casinos do not have complete security measures and rely on six security guards to protect the first floor, knowing that the society is out of order? The arms dealers have no means of protecting themselves, so they can only say that there are people above me, trying to scare away the opposite side; the hospitals have no special personnel to protect them, so anyone can Can come in with a gun. It may not be very sensible to find setting logic in a thriller, so I will not discuss this aspect too much, but there is no doubt that because of these shortcomings, the background of the film is not complete and full, and it is not worthy of brainless tout. Next, let's talk about the character settings. There are three protagonists in the group, and their personalities can be found in their conversations and behaviors, but there is not much sense of fetters in the picture where the three coexist. Even when they died, I didn't feel everyone else being sad, only the tension and urgency imposed by the director. This is really fatal. I prefer that the director wants to say too much, but he does not have the ability to express them clearly, so every point is detached at the touch of a button, floating on the surface. As for the plot bugs, I won't talk about them. I just assume that the innocence and cowardice of the protagonist group is what the plot needs, the dementia and incompetence of other characters are to promote the development of the plot, and the merciful and unhurried of the killer comes from self-confidence. It's more of an action movie than a thriller. There is no horror and suspense coexisting in a thriller, and there is no thought-provoking fun after being frightened. The thriller based on sound effects is too thin. In short, it is understandable if this movie is just for comfort without thinking; but if you want to discuss it in depth, there are really too many pain points, and a lot of team members are wasted. Reasonable discussions are welcome, and if you're refuting just to refute me, you don't have to waste each other's time.
View more about Time to Hunt reviews
