Everyone understands film politics differently. Does the film insult China? In my opinion, there must be, not only humiliating China, but also racial discrimination, humiliating Russia, humiliating Jews, and making fun of the pig thing, satirizing the traditional media, and the film has done all the politically incorrect things.
What should I do if the person watching is angry? People say that this is an artistic creation, a black humor, a ridicule, and there is no malicious intent, so they fool the past. It's not like those situations in your life that say "you can't be a joke" to you. Therefore, I generously admit that I did not contribute a penny to the pirated version I watched. If the movie was released in China, I would not support it. This is my attitude. Even because of Guy Ritchie's creative style, I won't go to the cinema to contribute to the box office of any of his films, I'm just a prostitute.
If politics aside, the movie is indeed very exciting, with multiple narratives, multiple elements, and multiple characters. Guy Ritchie has returned to the beginning, and it is also the style that suits him the most. However, that doesn't make me lose sight of the film's evil, and the director's bad attitude.
The point I agree with is that cultural self-confidence means using literary and artistic works to fight back. Rather than arguing in the discussion area of a movie, I hope that our movie can also add these "jokes" to cultural creation, and there will be a scene. The protagonists gather around to discuss whether the "white pig" is a bridge of racial discrimination.
View more about The Gentlemen reviews
