When the narrator that my daughter found said what people in prison did to her mom to make "that woman who sang" stop singing, I thought "rape" all of a sudden. And, indeed, rape. Then some doubts that had arisen over dinner the night of the movie were answered.
When people can't destroy a woman's spirit, they will use the most primitive and most effective way to try to destroy her (the most primitive is often the most effective?) - sexual violence, that is, physical oppression . When I thought of the word "rape", I really suddenly and completely figured it out. I can imagine a man saying "get this woman" and waving behind him, and then one or more burly men came out and started talking to each other. A woman with bruises and bruises to humiliate; but I can't imagine a female ruler saying "get this man" and then a bunch of women come out and humiliate a man in this way. Because women are always weak physically, we do not have the ability to suppress each other, and more importantly, there is no "tool for committing crimes".
So I thought, I stumbled on something that afternoon, and I was surprised that if men were doing these things, I would find them horrible, objectifying women, nasty, but if women were doing these things, I was okay with it. Why is there such a double standard attitude? Probably not only because of the better understanding between the same sex and the so-called "favoritism" (I really think this is engraved in the DNA), but more importantly, because of the "innate advantage", all the initiative has always been In the hands of men, they can say it and do it, while women do not act most of the time. We are still vulnerable, so why try to "correct" my personal double-standard attitude? The weak can only comfort themselves by hugging together for warmth.
Go to sleep! Said to go to bed early but it is still a new day (my early going to bed means: go to bed before 1 o'clock)
View more about Incendies reviews
