I don't want to talk about movies, I want to talk about the film reviews I saw.
Seeing some long comments, I really can't stretch myself. It's been a long time since I laughed so happily.
Why would anyone think that the three views of the movie are not right because the villain's three views are not right, and then give a low score to the movie?
Doesn't anyone really use the villain boss as the protagonist and life mentor?
Why is a villain a villain? Isn't it because what he did was wrong?
"People only know to cherish after they lose", this is the idea of the villain, please, this is not the idea of this movie.
The villain has to be motivated, right? So the screenwriter gave him motivation. But this is the motive of the villain, not to say that this movie encourages you to think so, do it.
At the end of the movie, the villain won. Explain that the movie recognizes the villain and supports the villain?
I can go to you.
"Batman The Dark Knight" is also Joker's victory in the end. Does anyone think that the movie is praising Joker?
What you want to show when you watch a movie is about the process, the atmosphere shaped by the whole, not just the ending.
In "Memories of Murder", no murderer was caught in the end, so isn't this movie positive?
If someone starts with the logic, performance, storyboard, and plot of the movie and criticizes the movie for not doing well, there is still value and room for discussion.
But just because the villain has shaped it so well and is too annoying, I feel that the three views of the movie are not correct, and then give a low score. I really don't know where to start complaining.
View more about Saw reviews
