After watching this movie, I can't help but think about what is the correct view of love. The relationship between ED and AMY is obviously not accepted by ordinary people. Their love is extreme and romantic. In the movie, except for ED's children, it seems that everyone understands and supports their love and can be moved by ED's deep affection. The film does not tell the process of their falling in love, but mainly describes the extreme lingering between life and death after the death of ED.
The only thing they went wrong was their age, but it was also indispensable, which destined ED to be tolerant and fond of AMY. Love should be two people stepping up the ladder. The professor helped Amy become a better version of himself. He contradicted the hope that he could always be by Amy's side, or Qingfeng, or Qiuye, or a dog. , or the flying bird, he is jealous of the people who will accompany Amy in the future, and he hopes to bring all positive and beautiful things to Amy.
I think it is very, very difficult for the children of ED to accept AMY. Thinking from the perspective, who can accept that the father's lover is a child of his own age?
This is love, and they will do the most intimate thing between lovers. This is family love, AMY is attached to ED because of childhood trauma, and ED will always accommodate his girl.
This is the true soul mate. It has nothing to do with identity, age, or worldliness. It's just that two weak souls meet and know each other in the vast universe.
View more about Correspondence reviews
