Briefly talk about the next person's understanding of the film. Compared with the movie [Parasite] of the same genre, there is no doubt that the level of the narrative of this film has risen directly from the ordinary struggle against the rich to the regime change. The name of the movie "Change of Dynasty" is called New Order. Obviously, it is a political means to loot wealth and eliminate the replacement of power by launching a political movement, so as to achieve the purpose of power transfer. The riots that took place between them and the looting of the rich were just casualties of the power struggle. I didn't understand it at first after reading it, but after thinking about it, I roughly understood it, so I said that this is a political movement with alternating rights. Compared with Parasite, this is a political movie that rises to a macro situation. Under the political turmoil, no matter the bottom and middle rich people are not spared.
From the wedding scene of the protagonist's family and the family of guests, it can be seen that the protagonist's family is not rich or expensive, and even should be the leader of politicians. It can be seen that a female judge also came to participate in the film. Everyone pays attention to the female judge. She came by detour, said that the main street was blocked, and that she also came here by detour, indicating that the mob who plundered at that time had been gathered by some kind of signal on the way she came.
And everyone noticed that the white-bearded old man in the middle, who was with the general, had already left when the female employer was handling the loan, and the white-bearded old man said a sentence that obviously led to his problem. The cancellation of the original planned route shows that the white-bearded old man knew that the original route had changed and changed his route.
As soon as the hostess went out, the riots swept across the room. The bodyguard who was watching over the home of the hostess should also have a problem. When the rioters appeared at the banquet, one of the guests called the bodyguard and shot the bodyguard. Punching the feet of the guests and yelling for everyone to come in.
It was obvious that someone had told the bodyguards in advance. The army behind the heroine who was arrested and locked up also has problems. Careful friends should also find that when they came to take away the heroine, there were only three soldiers. What did they seem to be looking for? The color of the uniform was also different when the general ordered the execution, indicating that this unit was specially ordered to search for the rich for extortion. And generally, from the national level, this kind of troops will usually transfer soldiers from non-local service in unrelated places in the city to carry out the reason. Everyone should understand that from the scene in the film, a soldier kicks a child and feels that there is still life. There is also a problem with the behavior of refilling the gun instantly. This is really cruel. Children don't forget to refill the gun.
To a large extent, I feel that these violent and oppressive soldiers are most likely the last three soldiers who were prepared and trained by the general to deal with extortion and collect money for him. The execution also verifies this statement. You collect all the money for me. All these soldiers will be silenced in the future. In fact, all the hostages who were extorted should not survive even if they were given money. The military will definitely destroy everything. The reason why the heroine was brought out is that they want to put the blame on the honest family in the play, because the honest family knows that this matter of extortion will definitely not be able to live, and it is impossible to survive by borrowing a knife to kill. In fact, when the heroine's father and his son talked to his father about extortion, he should probably know what was going on and only asked his son what she had to do with this matter. When he needed another million, the son immediately called the general and asked his father specifically if he knew? This also shows that at the end of the film, I also want to say that the final winner should be the general and the white-bearded old man. The two sides should be the one who will improve the political power, and the military power should also benefit from politics. Who is bigger and who is smaller should also have tangent interests. . The honest and the rich are blackmailed as well as the commoners are the victims. Those rioters are also high-level pawns. . . The above is just my personal opinion after watching the movie. . .
View more about New Order reviews
