Ah, I was originally going to write a short review. They were all illogical thoughts, and they couldn't be considered a film review at all. That's what I felt after watching the movie. Too much chatter, too many words.
Very emotional, probably, but also understand, but do not want to understand the protagonist.
(one)
There is no doubt that this is a large-scale onlooker performance and experimental scene. Truman's world, perfect irony, man-made tragedy.
However, the people in there are doing well. Leo looked really pious, kind, and a shaky, emaciated father, his eyes were really pitiful and kind, and he only hoped that the poor child would survive. Hot coffee in water glasses, cigars and blankets. There is also a mother who is obsessed, neurotic, and praying regardless of the outside world.
Leo must also be a very good person, he looks so kind, with bright eyes and long eyelashes. He kept saying, I'm celebrating my wedding anniversary on Friday. He's going to carry it. He has been atonement. Because I dug up a few jars that cost less than twenty dollars. He said that the sound of the drill was so loud and so close to him, he begged them to stop digging.
But her wife never loves her, doesn't care about his life or death, just wants to make money to leave this boring and boring town, and wants to fly away with her "hero". The sheriff is an official who only cares about his campaign and speeches. His hobbies are feeding snakes, and he does not pay for meals.
Of course, the shaping of the main event is our male protagonist.
(two)
First of all, let me express my disgust for him. First of all, his appearance is annoying. Such a selfish, evil, conspirator, never giving up to achieve his own goals, violent and extreme stinker, but he has good writing skills, good speech skills, very understanding of human nature, and very ambitious. This is bad. As a person who is eager to establish historical achievements in the field of journalism and wants to be a hero, a shocking news cannot be desired. In the short term, he can go back to New York, in the long term, he has a place in history. How can a human phoenix perch on a tree stump? This person does not pay attention to the daily trivial matters of Chen Zhi and rotten millet every day, but likes to fantasize about big news. I live in my imagination every day, well, when the opportunity comes, I can imagine and make up a good story, and I want to be famous in history. In fact, the main man is a novelist, which is not bad. But he's a journalist, disloyal to facts, disrespectful to readers, and has no work ethic at all. How should I put it, the so-called respect for readers and "give them the ending they want" is nothing but the achievement of his huge bubble. He doesn't care about facts at all, and only lives in "big news" and "amazing heroic stories". He wants to be a hero, tries to obtain historical achievements, lives in delusions, and even does not hesitate to fabricate false stories to harm his life.
Of course, he wasn't without a conscience either. As a paranoid, he wants "everything as he says", which is the power of the novelist, not the journalist who records the facts. He's extremely paranoid and desperate for control, that's "his story." So he couldn't accept that Leo's wife didn't love him, stupid, indifferent. It's really too deep into the play, he is triumphant, his words are aggressive, he talks about conditions, and is ready to go back to where he belongs. Of course, it was too deep into the play, and Leo's death shocked him and shed tears. But it is estimated that it is more for myself, for the death of the story. Finally, he is ready to sacrifice himself to do the most real and beautiful news. As a result, fainted. The life of art, the end of the movie.
He acted really well. Ah, here I also want to talk about his follower, a confused and simple child, from the class to the editor, but also to do something, the so-called "future", "career". I think that the journalism students trained by the college may be naive, dogmatic, and do not understand human nature, but at least they are kind. Of course, it may be relatively simple, and it is easy to be incited. But I really hate those old rivers and lakes that have been immersed in society for a long time. I still like the arrogance of the good-born, what is it called, the flower of Gao Ling! The so-called "I know what readers want" is just flattery. I like uncompromising, I like the persistence, angularity, and purity of that young man.
There is also the Sun News Agency in this small place, which is very good. It may be calm, boring and trivial, and there are not many sales, but how precious is this kind of inflexible and conservative, "tell the truth", tell the truth, insist on telling the truth.
In the end, I feel that the classics really stand up to the scrutiny of time, and look at the new ones every day. The same applies today. Title party, marketing account, how many 10w+ explosions are not the so-called grabbing readers' interest, eyeballs, and creating some vulgar and false meaningless things. In such a market where bad money drives out good money, it is really difficult to keep the media people sticking to it. You still have to have a posture, you have to have a character, and you should kneel if you are flattering. What is the difference between a man and a dog?
View more about Ace in the Hole reviews
