The ending is too bad. The racial issue in the original work is just a background. The Candy Man is essentially a grievance similar to the grudge Riga Coconut. It has become a symbol of the oppressed black community. Why should the male protagonist be sacrificed? Although he was discriminated against by some white people, he was living a good life. You forcibly transformed him into a candy man and abused him with only half his life, and induced the police to hunt him down and finally blame the white police for violent law enforcement? Just because he was the baby in the first movie, but in the first Candyman, the baby was taken away to force the heroine to commit suicide, and the heroine's previous life was Candy's lover before her life. Everything is reasonable, here's the logic and plot All made concessions to the racial issue, and the director also deliberately portrayed the murdered people as wicked people, as if Candyman was a violent justice enforcer, but Candyman obviously kills everyone, blacks and children. No matter what race, gender, age, good or bad, just like Gaya, you must die when you enter the door. Well, then I will watch it as a revenge torture movie, but you are deliberately disgusting at the end. If the male protagonist has a very miserable life and resentment like the previous Candy Man, then I agree with your adaptation. Well, I will read it as a fan work, but no, the male protagonist has a mother who loves and a wife who loves it. Not worrying about wearing life is very happy, it is very unreasonable that he is forced to become a candy man! Except the feelings of the first part are really all self-righteous stupid adaptations.
View more about Candyman reviews
