In fact, I feel that this movie is quite reasonable, because it is from the background of Ah Sanguo, and this movie does not sing and dance without saying a word, it is restrained. But because of this protagonist, it makes me physically uncomfortable, because he looks too much like my dean, and I hate it so much. In terms of the plot, the reversal and comedy parts are very complete. The transformation of this person is still very big. I just watched it and thought it was very strange. It changed too fast, and that point was also very random. It's almost done, I just changed the style of painting for any reason; another one has changed too fast, the villagers. Since most of the people were painted so demented before, how could it be so easy to become enlightened later. Maybe it's because I doubled the speed, or maybe it's a bug. . . Many ironic points in the film are in place, (such as toilets and dogs and the old village chief of Master Duan Shui) always know that the caste system of Ah Sanguo is very stubborn, so the exaggeration of the film is too easy for me to accept, I think instead I don't know what it is like in reality. But if he was bullied by everyone in front of him because of his caste, then he can't explain his righteousness later. Maybe that's why he insisted that everyone called him a fool because he looked stupid, so am I? ? ? But speaking of this film, the so-called revealing reality is not as good as the previous "Padman". The caste is only used to build a platform to create the main line, and the abuse of votes is also part of the dramatic conflict. To say that it is actually about a villager at the bottom because of a name It is not strong enough to become a saint, so why did it get a score of 7+? But don't say that because the people who rated it think we dare not shoot, isn't it very daring to sweep the black.
View more about Mandela reviews
