In fact, similar themes, it is difficult to shoot wonderful, often thankless.
After all, real history is often not so good-looking, or even a little ugly.
It seems that the grievances between Israel and the PLO cannot be explained clearly in a sentence or two. What's even more heartwarming is that Lao Mei always mixes in it, making the water more muddy.
The conflict between Palestine and Israel finally intensified, and both sides were exhausted. The "peacekeeping" led by the United States "discussed countermeasures" in places far away, and the leaders of the PLO could only sit outside and wait.
The "weak country has no diplomacy" circulating on the Internet a while ago has been fully reflected "once again".
This problem that the old and the United States "couldn't handle it" was quietly solved by a "minor official" and a "mediation expert" in Norway, which is a powerful irony in itself.
Of course, things didn't work out so smoothly.
The reason why they can become "diplomatic textbooks" is that the couple themselves still need strong abilities, and the hardships encountered during the period are often beyond ordinary people's imagination. Politics are turbulent, and if you want to draw chestnuts from the fire, you often need to bear huge pressure.
The PLO negotiated a "cute" old man, who was poisoned by "weak countries without diplomacy" and could only sit in a hotel and worry.
On the other side of the battlefield, the people of Palestine were using stones against Israel's soldiers armed to the teeth, saying that he didn't feel sorry for his own people, it was definitely not justified.
However, a unilateral ceasefire, such a decision to "slay power and humiliate the country" is absolutely impossible.
If you want to talk, you can't talk, if you want to fight, you can't.
To be a good politician, you must have the ability to choose from a dilemma.
Perhaps, the emergence of Norway is a turning point for things.
In fact, to put it bluntly, the art of negotiation is not much different from the art of cheating.
This lovely old man was tricked by Norway to participate in the negotiation, only to discover that Israel had only sent two civilians.
The old man was so angry that he almost flipped the table, thinking that I was also the No. 2 person in Dangdang Bajie, and I was talking to a civil organization. If it spreads out, it won't be a shame? Besides, if this is known to the public, wouldn't the public's support be completely lost?
It's just a pity that it is absolutely impossible and has to seek the possibility.
To have a chance to sit down, even if it is to say a few words calmly, is not a small improvement.
In the process of negotiation, the old man did not fail, but the two sides told a joke, even if the joke would be "out of place", at least we can know that both sides have "unbelievable" prejudice against each other.
The effect of the talks far exceeded expectations, and Israel also saw hope.
The level of participation in secret talks also began to increase accordingly.
The new descendants, at least represent the official. With a strong military presence, official representatives always have a slightly domineering stance.
However, the battle-hardened old man, in terms of principle, is quite "stinky and hard".
Negotiation is the art of compromise. However, if it is only a compromise of one party, it will only be completely reduced to "weak countries without diplomacy".
The secret talks continued, and the Israeli side finally dispatched the final lineup.
This is basically the highest level of negotiations before the official.
Not surprisingly, the negotiations between the two sides are still full of gunpowder, and the problem of historical reasons should not be completely solved through one or two negotiations.
Every "concession" and "forbearance" of the old man can be called a textbook of diplomatic mediation.
The final "fruit of victory" was still "sit back and enjoy" by Lao Mei.
To be honest, the reason for the secret talk is to prevent the "old beauty", but when the results are finally produced, the "old beauty" cannot be avoided.
After all, diplomacy still has to rely on strength to speak.
However, the reason why this bland story is so brilliant is precisely because the "ant" can also "bring down the elephant" through the method. It just depends on whether the person in it is truly wise.
The ending of the story is great.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict was finally resolved, and the people on both sides could finally meet without fighting, which should be a good thing.
However, such peace did not last long.
The conflict between the two sides has not been fundamentally resolved, but perhaps the "secret talk" coincided with the meeting, which happened when both sides were exhausted.
After the two sides rested, they still chose to "continue the conflict".
They are not experts on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, nor do they know the root cause of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, so they have no choice but to "continue the conflict".
However, in the story, there is still the most crucial question, which was also questioned by Israeli legal experts.
That is, the Palestine-Israel issue is so far away, what does this have to do with Norway, why is a small Norwegian diplomat so concerned, even at the risk of his own future, even pulling his country into the "diplomatic whirlpool" ", what is the picture?
It's nothing to do with hanging up high, haven't you heard of this?
This may have to start from the history of the founding of Norway. If you are interested, you may wish to search it.
A small country can try its best to help another small country, so where is the big country capable of helping?
Could it be that all these big countries ran with Lao Mei?
Or when you see that a small country "has no diplomacy", you just say "weak countries have no diplomacy", so go back to a strong country first, right?
Taking other people's pain as the capital to show off, this makes people feel embarrassed...
View more about Oslo reviews
