At the beginning of this fall into hell, I saw the special effects of his clips from the short video of the UP master. I felt that I was looking forward to watching the main film, but after watching it, I was deeply uncomfortable, not because of how scary it was. It is the worldview expressed by the film director that makes people feel hopeless. His plot is that an old lady's bank loan has been defaulted many times. The heroine sympathizes with her special experience, like the superior intercedes, and then the superior hints that the heroine can no longer accommodate the bank. The heroine rejects the old lady in order to survive and keep the job. It is worth a visit What I mentioned is that the old lady herself has a daughter, but she is unwilling to go to her daughter's place for fear of causing trouble to her, but never thought that repeated bank defaults would cause trouble to the bank? Then it was the moral kidnapping of the heroine by kneeling down. The heroine avoided her and fell directly to touch the porcelain. The heroine launched a terrorist attack on the heroine after get off work, and then the old lady cursed, and the heroine was haunted by evil spirits and went to hell. . . . As far as this plot is concerned, after watching it, it makes people feel that what is the standard for going to hell? Do you have to help others within your ability? Go to hell just to survive? And shouldn't banks be accommodating to the poor's subprime mortgage? If I'm poor, I'm justified in not paying back the money? You should go to hell if you don't accommodate my poor? Those white leftists in the United States are still afraid that they have not been awakened by the subprime mortgage crisis? The bank's assets are not the bank's own, and others also have investors. It can be said that the bank is directly responsible for the property of their investors, and they pity other people? Are investors not human? And Bai Zuo doesn't understand that anyone who lends you a loan at a high interest rate is your benefactor, because if you are a normal person, it is impossible for you to repay the money, and it is impossible for them to lend you money without interest. Give you credit and you may not live a day. Someone who can lend you money at the risk of defaulting and going bankrupt is a good person, and the so-called interest is just because you have a high probability of not being able to repay the money, which is a manifestation of high risk. Only in this way can the risk be recovered. Moreover, in the plot, normal credit is not usury at all. The bank is already the benefactor of the old lady. I don't owe the old lady anything at all, and the old lady has a daughter. It is really a problem of the US government to go bankrupt because of too expensive medical care in the US. It is reasonable to say that you should seek revenge from politicians and the president, rather than curse the bank that helped you in the first place. The logic of this type of white-left movie is that everyone must be like a Buddha, who sacrifices their lives to cut flesh and feed eagles. Such a thing is not worth refuting, because if you can't do it yourself, you can't ask others to do it. Are the so-called vulnerable groups represented by the old lady really vulnerable? Or is she herself a real hell devil in a weak coat, like a Like vampires, they are possessed by the social welfare system, opening their fangs and constantly sucking the blood of this American society. . .
View more about Drag Me to Hell reviews
