After World War II, the two major ideological games, the Vietnam War must not be ignored, the Vietnam War documentary that has not been watched happens to connect with the beginning of this film (the picture is a screenshot of the documentary: ?? The civil rights movement is mighty, and the unarmed demonstrators are arrested by polices In the east, one after another monks self-immolated in the streets to protest the persecution of Buddhists by the Wu regime...), one by one, the young lives were sent to the front line, and my eyes were drawn from the battlefield to ??domestic. There are actually various ways of presenting the plot of the movie, interspersed with jumping timelines, realistic restoration of violent scenes, internal disputes in court, Abby Hoffman's stand-up comedy scene, etc., but court scenes account for a large proportion, mainly The highlights are also in the screenwriting (lines) and acting skills. It is not just impassioned mouthpieces. I believe those speeches have really touched the nerves of every audience, not to mention that the release time is right after Floyd was killed and before the election. The role of the judge strongly reflects that the judiciary is nothing more than a marionette of leaders, the attorney general is replaced with the change of the president, and the case is retried with the change of the president to kill the chickens. How do you believe that in a country that shouts "law and order", the judge is in "his court", like a dictator and a clown, arbitrarily and irritably again and again, but still able to speak out Said he never discriminated against blacks. It's not just him, you can see the darkness of the entire judiciary, their bullets break into the homes of innocent people in the dark, their people infiltrate the movement in disguise, their bugs are in the defense attorney's office, they fake The letter of intimidation kicked out the jurors who were not on their side. Their "righteousness" was to beat the defendant who had not yet been convicted, and to pretend to be in court was a fair trial that everyone could see as unfair... In the end, Hayden "briefly" read out the names of the soldiers who died in the Vietnam battlefield. As a movie clip, it may be sensational, but it is also worth it. They are all victims of this ideological war, and the people who come Said that they are 60,000 compatriots who died for the country. There is no right or wrong between the liberal idealism and utilitarian pragmatism represented by Abbey and Hayden and their party. The Chicago Seven were finally acquitted, but Nixon won the vote, and the Vietnam War is still going on... …If you only engage in sports and no one is in the position to change the situation, the farce will only end later, and it will be difficult for society to get on the right track; method to resist, this is a fiery lash against the icy state apparatus, and the phrase "if you want to bleed, let it flow all over Chicago" provoked a larger scale The violent conflict is from Hayden, who prides himself on being sane. The balance no longer maintains a neutral balance. The more it tilts to the right, the more weight the left has to increase... The wheels of history are rolling forward, but some stories are repeated in cycles. 50 years ago, the "?? The government refurbishes every 4 years" The same is true today. There are still many details in the film that are worth analyzing. The insertion of the fictional character 囧 Joseph adds a touch of humanity; Dai Lingjie, as a father, is guilty of his son after losing control in court; Rubin was rescued in the riot and was almost violated. The woman; the seriousness and enthusiasm of Abby's laughter and scolding. I found that many film critics focus on the judge, Schultz and the Eight Gentlemen. Few people mention the lawyer Kunstler. It was his efforts to promote the process of the trial. If I choose a famous scene other than the end of the film, I will I think Kunstler and Hayden simulated the defense in the "conspiracy office". Kunstler's lawyers are fully demonstrated, and Hayden's words should not be underestimated, although in the end it was Abby who explained that "blood" was "our". blood", but the court did not mention it either. The trial ended with the seven gentlemen innocent, can it be said that they won? It's just that the government doesn't want to play with them anymore, and they haven't "end the
View more about The Trial of the Chicago 7 reviews
