Let's start with the center of the plot, probably due to my own weakness in the political correctness of the "cliché" and the fact that I have witnessed a more magical reality in recent years, but I have no passion for the political theme of the story, Sigh.
So the first half of the plot was very calm, and there were no major disturbances in the heart, but the second half felt much better. The episode of racial discrimination was said to be true, and it felt terrifying; The design is very old-fashioned; the confrontation between Abby and Tom feels very exciting, because I think the story will tell the grievance to the end, but I did not expect Tom to fan the flames; Abby's final testimony answer design is also very good; at the end, read the list of soldiers The shooting was great. Other structural designs are analyzed in great detail, so they will not be repeated here.
Because I don't like the main theme, the focus is still on the portrayal of the characters. Generally, I don't like being interrupted when watching a movie, but this one is paused after two or three sentences, and I don't feel bored. Because it always takes a few minutes to understand what they are talking about (I suspect that my English listening level is seriously degraded hhh), and I also need to savour and recall the meaning inside (so I just watched it for more than 3 hours hhh). The most impressive of all the characters is Abby Hoffman. He should have the most lines. I think he is the most colorful and richest character. Then there was the little freckles. I didn't feel it in front. When I expressed my heart in the back, I sighed that no wonder he was so anxious in front and echoed back and forth. Such a moving scene, a person like Abby who flips the table seems to make more sense. The defense lawyer's performance is stubborn, and the prosecutor's Jon Joseph seems to be in a play. I always feel that the traces of the performance are too heavy. I always feel this way when I see his works (except for the five hundred days with summer. Movie). The judge with the worst impression is the judge. I don't know what the real history is. If it is not the case, then the shaping of this character is too one-sided, like the villain in the children's cartoon; if this is the case, it is even more outrageous. , the existence of such a powerful and blatant clown in the world has shocked me for a whole year.
Finally, let me just say a few thoughts. When everything starts, people will forget the original origin. There is a sentence in the story that is about that. Indeed, the Republican Party believes that they provoked the conflict, and the middle process seems to be proving that they are not the police, but in the end it seems to be their responsibility through internal discussions, but this is different from the initial accusation against them. nature. The premise is ideal. The process of seeking the true image is distorted and distorted through multiple witness factors, and the conclusion I have come to is also distorted. In the end, the true image is also blurred, and the right and wrong are not clear. Idealism lost the situation, but was still praised in awe and sung in people's hearts; Conservatism won in history because of its focus, strength and practicality. Presumably, time moves forward with such a balance.
the river is long and tempestuous, it was like a hero………
View more about The Trial of the Chicago 7 reviews
