Maybe it's because of the relationship between reading the paper first (how can someone read the paper analyzing the film before watching the film is outrageous) I always feel that it is a bit too sophisticated, too like a movie (bushi), and there is nothing left for the story and the audience (this is In terms of EP, the EP is better) But the story pace is better than the EP. The opening 20 minutes are very good. The dull, gloomy, grotesque, and hidden crisis are all arranged properly. In contrast, the EP is still too impatient to enter the main line. The completion of the story is not as good as this one (but the EP aesthetic space is larger, delicate, long and aftertaste is a very beautiful poem) This is probably a very delicate novel
I hope DC will find you more Viggo for filming. I really know how to dig out the most delicate and wonderful parts of V's acting skills. This film actually contributed more than EP. I personally think that the acting is more like an actor. Kings (and V is too easy to play as a good guy x I still like to watch him play someone who is not normal x)
View more about A History of Violence reviews
