usad flashbacks and edgy breakdown

Elizabeth 2022-03-20 09:01:40

It was a wonderful viewing experience. The whole movie is fast-paced and the lines are dense. The characters have to do a lot of homework (fortunately, I did it in advance two years ago.

A lot of the scenes are alternating between film and real video, it's too tense

I cried twice throughout the whole process. The second time was at the end. Tom read out the list of more than 4,000 American soldiers who died in the Vietnam War. The defendant, the prosecution, the jury and the auditors all stood up together.

The first time was the girl who was holding the Stars and Stripes in the parade but was hated by a group of men for not going home and making sandwiches. After the chaos caused by the confrontation between the police and the parade, she fell down and was torn by the group of men and trapped between the two sides. who can protect her

There are so many ghosts in my head that I haven't experienced in the past and what I'm watching now makes me dizzy and I just cry incompetently

I really hope that you will watch the two-hour movie. I feel that I have to question many of my previous remarks and opinions. How can the public speak out under extreme power and protect themselves

Theme of USAD 2019

The 1960s: A Transformational Decade

Theme of USAD 2069 (i'd doubt its longevity)

The 2020s: Latest Update for V2.0 of the 1960s - check out COVID!

Affirmative Democracy these are idealistic shells what do we fill them with and how do we fill them and when I compare these marchers in the movie to the people who were in DC the other day I'm at a loss but it's like we Adhering to procedural justice, there is always something that is worth protecting regardless of national conditions, color, you and me

The whole world is watching.

The script for the social network was also written by the film's director, Sorkin, and the next movie is to see his "Newsroom," the so-called Fourth Power.

At that time, the repression was so tragic, was it because there were so many rebels and so many vanguards? Are we going for silent revolt or bloody evolution?

Of course film and television works are for sensationalism, but hey isn't real life more dramatic for now

After watching Cui Wa's "born a crime" last week, if your expectation is a talk show, you can read a born and firm belief instead. The book talks about how his mother, in his stepfather's clan, a traditional patrilineal clan, rebelled against the rules of inequality. She mocks the rules by overdoing instead of disobeying them. A woman should bow to a man, and his mother knelt down directly, "grabbing the earth with her head". Also in the Chicago7 movie, in order to show "respect" to the judge, the second of the Seven Gentlemen directly changed into the judge's outfit to attend the court trial.

View more about The Trial of the Chicago 7 reviews

Extended Reading
  • Kaya 2022-03-23 09:01:48

    It feels like the movie is poking fun at Trump.

  • Vickie 2021-11-27 08:01:20

    Sorkin's film should be called speech film: a film that is driven entirely by dialogue, connects the shots with dialogue, and takes dialogue as the main or even sole action. What’s particularly obvious in this film is that a scene is often cut from a character’s sentence to half, and then the character in the next scene completes the sentence. The speech montage is created by contrast, extension, and repetition of words, while the rest of the sound effects (cup sound, applause, method) Hammers, door slamming) are one of the few punctuation marks between uninterrupted lines. The soundtrack is insignificant. In this film, only short-lived scenes like police-civil conflicts that do not center on recognizable dialogue exist as imperceptible bass harmonies (this is not the case with "Social Network"). Fortunately, speech is the characteristic of the court and the core of civil disobedience. The struggle for the right to speak has become the most intuitive (heard) drama conflict in the film, and all emotional transfers are also ignited by the plot related to the right to speak and speak. The disadvantage is that the film has become a large-scale mansplain spiritual scene in the 1960s. This fascination with speech and the limited progressive politics of white men represented by Sokin are two sides.

The Trial of the Chicago 7 quotes

  • Sondra: You can't give this speech in Chicago!

    Bobby Seale: Fred Hampton wants me there. Plane ticket.

    Sondra: Let Fred give the speech!

    Bobby Seale: Between Hayden and Hoffman there could be 5'000 people. It'd be nice to talk to 5'000 people.

    Sondra: Not while you're in trouble in Connecticut.

    Bobby Seale: Yes, well I'm in trouble - I'm the head of the Black Panthers, Sondra! When the hell am I not gonna be in trouble? Travel bag.

    Sondra: You're going to be in a lot more of it if you stand up and say 'Fry the pigs!'

    Bobby Seale: IF they attack me. You're taking it out of context.

    Sondra: So will every white person in America! Cops won't give a shit about context, and you don't have enough protection in Chicago.

    Bobby Seale: There's no place to be right now but in it.

    Sondra: But 'Fry the pigs'?

    Bobby Seale: IF they attack...

    Sondra: Dr. King...

    Bobby Seale: Is dead! He has a dream? Well now he has a fucking bullet in his head! Martin's dead, Malcom's dead, Medgar's dead, Bobby's dead, Jesus is dead. They tried it peacefully, we're gonna try something else.

  • John Mitchell: Richard, Chicago was more fucked up than any ten things I've seen in my life.