soft and hard science fiction you like best? both of coz
I do not like not soft not hard
to write science fiction is the most difficult people to convince themselves especially hard science fiction
so I like the idea of love like the first half of the latter part of the topic does not like the latter part of the treatment
for burrowing people now live to this already difficult to justify in this area are also not to mention the face of experts
then simply as half as before of talking like a clever detour Well
why suddenly clinging to verify later Is it true or false even at the end of a bad white drama where father and son recognize each other?
Very good idea that
I like that part of the topic of Jesus for three major religions in my opinion has been
so might as well assume that it came from the three major religions:
the gods (though he is God, Allah or Buddha) left some revealing God The stories of the traces The founders of the three major religions got these stories in different parts of the world, and they studied the stories and wrote different reading experiences. These experiences are the earliest teachings
. Think like this, Jesus, Muhammad, and Shakyamuni The character of the brother is very obvious. The book is like the person.
Religion and theology are really interesting and worth discussing and pondering
(the above is copied from my Pulp Fiction film review ).
Originally, there are many similarities and even similarities between the three major religions. The way of expression is different. Of course, the vertical direction is not comparable, because they are all linked to politics. If there are political factors, they are mostly rotten eggs. It is difficult to distinguish the initial value.
PS Shandong University is a very good major. I like the study of Christianity, Buddhism and other religions. If it were not worried about finding a job is really worth reading
so that the film say Christianity from Buddhism actually a little shocked by this statement will not let me uproar also trouble for a long time
In fact, the whole movie is a reference topic lacks freshness reference innocent thing in addition to the original author of error is
just talk like I talk to, especially now live prehistoric and 4 great scientist +1 psychologist
but did not talk wisdom sparks a bit stuffy
overall, the general director of the movie could have been busted their ass to get hold of soft science fiction chosen to rely on hard science
made people lost all sexual desire circles beginning of the fun completely lose bad bad very bad
View more about The Man from Earth reviews
