Schrodinger's cat

Lillian 2022-03-18 09:01:03

The film tells that an old bishop in Chicago was killed, and his death was extremely tragic. There was only Alan with blood on his hands, and it was difficult to clear his suspicions. In prison, a lawyer was preparing to defend Allen. At first, he did not believe that Allen did not kill, because his suspicion was too great, and there was no evidence to prove that the person did not kill. He also did not believe the story that Allen told. , but in the follow-up investigation, Martin's lawyer found that Allen may have a double personality, another named Roy killed the bishop, and the poor Allen in front of him was innocent. Martin deliberately put Roy in court. Inspired, let people know that Allen has a dual personality, and helped Allen win the lawsuit.

I thought the movie would end here, but at the end, in the dialogue between Martin and Allen (should say Roy), Allen's sentence leaked out. He didn't have a dual personality at all. He pretended. In the end, Martin He woke up and asked, "So there was never Roy, right?" And the boy was full of evil and said, "You don't understand me yet? There's no Allen at all!"

Martin, who finally left the prison, was disappointed and confused, but more of the fear he saw in his eyes, first-degree fear!

I'm wondering if there really are dual personalities in this world? If the first dual personality is just faked without any flaws, and everyone is hidden from everyone, the doctor decides the disease, and then someone imitates the dual personality, To escape the punishment of the law, or to achieve other purposes, this question is a false proposition from the beginning, then there is no dual personality in this world, then if it is a true proposition, how to dialect its correctness? Like Schrödinger's cat, this cat has two possibilities, one is dead and the other is alive, but opening the box can't confirm the cat's state, so now the cat is half-dead and half-alive. , of course, this state certainly does not exist, but it cannot overthrow any of them. Is it possible that this is the case with dual personalities, even if it is difficult for people to believe, but they cannot bear to wrong an innocent person, they have to choose to accept it, because human nature is still much better!

View more about Primal Fear reviews

Extended Reading
  • Christelle 2022-03-25 09:01:06

    It's very smooth and no nonsense, and the role of the interviewer is quite new. Edward Norton's acting is not very good, but it fits the role very well

  • Adolphus 2022-03-24 09:01:26

    Norton's acting is very good, but the screenwriter is purely nonsense. In fact, in the United States, the defense of not guilty of murder with a mental disorder is basically a failure, and pled has not made a request for mental incapacity, and it is impossible to get off the crime. Mental illness must also comply with a series of strict identifications such as the Mnatan rule. Playing a lunatic in court can get rid of the crime and the judge dismisses the jury? Are you kidding me?

Primal Fear quotes

  • [Marty is trying to woo Janet again, kissing the back of her neck and humming as she smokes a cigarette at the bar in the party for the Archbishop]

    Martin Vail: Come on... all you have to do is turn around.

    Janet Venable: I thought you liked it better like this. That way you don't have to look at the person.

    Martin Vail: You're mean.

    [ingratiatingly]

    Martin Vail: Look at me.

    [She turns to face him. He is grinning seductively]

    Martin Vail: Come on. Let's go find a bar you can still smoke in.

    Janet Venable: Thanks for the invite, but I don't like one-night stands all that much.

    Martin Vail: We saw each other for months.

    Janet Venable: It was a one-night stand, Marty. It just lasted six months.

  • Martin Vail: [in a private room inside the district attorney's office] Mr. Pinero has never been convicted of anything. Cops jumped him, he was left bleeding in the snow. It's a miracle he survived. Having said that, I am not opposed to a settlement.

    John Shaughnessy: A million-five and Pinero leaves the state.

    Martin Vail: You can't limit a citizen's right to live wherever he wants to. Legally, that's unenforceable.

    John Shaughnessy: Whether or not it's enforceable or just a gentleman's agreement, Mr. Pinero will know what we want.