If a person sees "The Shawshank Redemption" or "Forrest Gump" and says that the special effects in this film are rubbish, 1 point! That person is probably insane.
Likewise, if a person says after watching "Godzilla" that the human plot of this film is too rubbish, 1 point! That man is almost insane.
**If the 100-point system is used, the scoring rules for feature films are roughly as follows:
Plot (40 points): including the beginning and ending, that is, the story
Character (30 points): including character building, script
Depth (20 points): Including the depth value of philosophy, society, etc.
Lens (10 points): including movement, long and short lenses, etc.
Bonus: visual effects, etc.
**Similarly, the scoring rules for monster films are roughly as follows:
Visual Effects (40 points): including modeling, motion design, motion capture, lighting rendering
Lens (20 points): including movement, scene scheduling, dynamic perspective, giant sense of monster, sense of blow, etc.
Monster story (20 points): including the process of fighting, who won and how, or the monster's growth/change experience
Monster character (15 points): scary or cute
Human Plot + Human Characters (5 points): No one cares no matter how well you do it, and the more you write, the part that goes off topic
Bonus: Depth
So, stop using the wrong grading scale, okay? Otherwise, "The Shawshank Redemption" may only have 10 points (100 points) or 1 point (10 points).
----split line----
Tell me about Godzilla vs. Kong.
Visual effects: Needless to say, the monster modeling is very good, the hair of King Kong is very natural, and the Hong Kong war is matched with the perfect punk neon lights, which is like a dance in hall D. The design of the geocentric world is very interesting, and it is also the most surprising place in the whole movie. The action of the monster is very good, the only flaw is that the action design is too fast during the duel, so that it lacks the rocky (mechanical) feeling of a little giant. 37 points.
Shots: Absolutely amazing, the long and short shots are used smoothly, the dynamic shots are excellent, and the looking up shots make the whole battle look huge. At one point I suspected that it was designed by Alfonso Cuaron's official photographer. Absolute perfect score!
Monster plot: not complicated, simple and straightforward. However, there is clearly more to be excavated in King Kong's journey to the center of the earth. The whereabouts of the ancestors, the connection with Godzilla, these can be clarified in depth. 15 points.
Monster character: King Kong is very well shaped and interacts well with humans. The evil spirit of Mechanic G is simply outrageous, and it also perfectly inherits the setting of Ghidorah's legacy, which can be said to be the best in this film. Needless to say about Godzilla, compared to the previous two works, this work has also done a good job of shaping Godzilla's deity. 13 points.
Human plot and human characters: I don't care. 0 marks.
Total score: 85 points!
In order to congratulate the successful completion of the first stage of Monster Universe, we will serve you with 5 stars!
By the way, by the way, wait for Dongbao X Netflix, Bone Club X Orange Club's "Godzilla: Singularity", which will start broadcasting immediately. As the well-known science fiction writer Yuancheng Tower, the Godzilla animated drama, I hope it can achieve a level of more than 80 points whether it is based on the standard of a feature film or a monster film.
View more about Godzilla vs. Kong reviews
