I think Batman must have a sense of faith. Is Nolan Batman so successful because this master is omnipotent and invincible? Nor is it when there is no overturning (either metaphorically or literally). But he has a strong sense of faith in Batman. He believes that Gotham can be and will be saved, and he believes that human nature still has the light of kindness. Otherwise, it wouldn't make any sense for him to put on a bat suit.
Zach also has this version of Batman. Many people criticized why Batman was irrational when he came to resurrect Superman, because they didn't take the dialogue and camera expression seriously. Batman made it clear when he was talking to Aquaman: "Have you heard of Superman? He fought side by side with me to death. We owe him."
Afu questioned why Batman was so up on the formation of the Justice League, he responded: "It's not because of Luther (warning), but because of him (referring to Superman), I promised before his grave."
This is why when Afu questioned Batman's plan to resurrect Superman, Bruce would say: "I only rely on my belief this time." Because in his heart, Superman is his belief.
Why is he so sure? Because he saw that a creature as strong as a god cared about his mother before he died, sacrificing his life for a world that he could easily destroy, even though many people in this world were questioning him. ("BVS" plot). In Batman's eyes, Superman represents human nature, and Batman said "(Superman made me believe) human beings are still kind" (the last line of "BVS"). After all, Batman's belief in Zach's eyes is the same as Nolan's eyes: Men are still good. Humans are worthy and can be saved.
So at this time, he was still defending Superman when he was resurrecting Superman. Why would you have doubts if you trust something? Batman can doubt anything. [Only Men are still good. This would make him meaningless wearing this bat suit. ] And the movie also said that Superman was in a state of embarrassment just after his resurrection. His attack on others was completely accidental. pit).
Resurrecting Superman itself is a desperate act. If Kryptonite and Louis are to be used to prevent Superman from destroying the world, we cannot help but ask a question: What if Superman feels threatened and no longer helps humans? (What do you mean by guarding me when you resurrected me?)-Of course Batman must think that Superman will definitely help humans, so what is the point of preparing for kryptonite? By the same token, if I call Louis and everyone who resurrected Superman attacks, then what is the point of Louis? How do you make sure that Superman who is attacking everyone will not kill Louis? So preparing for Kryptonite and Louis is totally unnecessary. This is also why Batman never counterattacked in the face of Superman's offense, because he didn't believe that Superman would destroy the world at the beginning. (As for you asking me why kryptonite is always available in the comics, I will tell you because the story of the comics is different from the story of Zhadao. There is no reason why Batman unconditionally trusts Superman in the comics. There is in the movie. And in the comics The way Superman trusts Batman infinitely is to give Batman a kryptonite ring. How come here Batman trusts Superman infinitely and does not accept Superman without defense?)
The blameworthy part of the taillight version is obvious from here. The heroes are in conflict all the time. Batman does not have complete trust in the person who is about to be resurrected, and his sense of faith is simply child's play. Isn't the Batman shaped like this more worthy of criticism? (I think there must be someone here who wants to talk about "Justice League: Destroy", please don't Batman trust any hero in this comic? It's completely different from the cause and effect of the movie. And the final heroes in "Destroy" are all going to be together. Batman fell out, which obviously contradicts the purpose of Batman in the Zha Dao Zheng Lian.)
This is the Batman created by Zhadao in my eyes. He is courageous and conscientious, highly conviction, and the role of fullness is high. He is a convincing team boss (you see Zhadao Bat is not even a joint army division but a commander-in-chief) . If this still does not satisfy some "Batman fans", then I really don't know what kind of Batman can satisfy them.
Summary: Because of the BVS plot, in Batman's eyes, Superman = human nature. And Batman can't be disappointed in human nature (otherwise he wouldn't wear a bat suit). And there is no need to guard against resurrecting a fully trusted person. Therefore, the bat does not need to keep a hand when resurrecting Superman.
View more about Zack Snyder's Justice League reviews