I don't know who made the original, but in terms of level, it has its own merits and advantages from Kurosawa Akira. Akira Kurosawa's composition pays more attention to emphasizing the confrontation between the two forces and the protagonist's intercourse, focusing on balance, combining front, middle and back scenes, more fragmented shots of big clients, more close-ups, and even subjective shots, less large panorama, people who like classics will prefer the former Well, but I think that in terms of mobilizing the audience's emotions and sense of substitution, the big whore is better. There is no way, I am an audience who has been fed by Western film and television habits. Akira Kurosawa's version is a bit more comedic, with a lot less action scenes, especially some cruel scenes that were not filmed. For example, when the protagonist was arrested, the description of being beaten was omitted. In contrast, the big client Fuyuki seemed more dedicated. After the action scenes are finished, the heart is great, and the plot is also finished. The plot of the big prostitute is more convincing, at least the villain is not as brainless and stupid as the heart stick. The character creation, the big whore client is relatively complete, at least it describes how Fuyuki thinks about how to break the opponent's rifle, and has a description of the protagonist's personal heart, while the Akira Kurosawa version pays more attention to the whole and events, and does not describe the personal heart. I like the soundtrack of this film very much, and I feel that Kurosawa is more refined. A few dark night outdoor scenes are a disadvantage. It is estimated that there is no lighting, and many characters on the screen are all black. This shortcoming Kurosawa Akira's version will not. Fuyuki was very handsome when he was young. At first glance, he thought it was Beckham.
View more about A Fistful of Dollars reviews
