"Now if a plane crashes on account of pilot error, do you blame the Boeing Corporation?" Whether it's a pure debate, or a legal defense, you need to prove more than you're right.
You can prove the other party is wrong, or the conclusion seems to be correct, once extended, it is wrong, similar to the landslide theory. For example: if you don’t finish the job today, you will be criticized by your teacher or boss tomorrow. Once you are criticized, you will fail the class or be fired. You will go home and be criticized by your family. You will go out to find friends. It's okay, but your friends are still going to school or work normally. Everyone is busy and has no time to take care of you. Then your family and friends have no time to communicate with you, and you will live a miserable life. ABCD - ... escalating this seemingly right thing is deviating from its original trajectory.
Either prove the logical error of the other party's reasoning. The process of gaining trust in the law is not correct, and the logic of reasoning is not correct. Looking at each question in isolation is a true statement, but it does not push the A-B down, thereby denying your entire process of reasoning. You just need to keep pointing out the other party's problems and keep throwing the blame on the other party. For example: A says that the tobacco company damages people's health and thus completely disregards the health of smokers. B said that tobacco companies prefer that smokers are healthy so that they can smoke. Another example: when you are prosecuted by a certain media or a prosecutor, it doesn’t matter whether the accusation it issued is correct, you can prove the media or prosecutor’s way of gaining trust or the style of this person/this person himself is problematic , which also proves that their claims are meaningless.
If you are just a spokesperson, whether it is a lawyer or a spokesperson for a certain party, it is really scary if you are completely from the point of view of interests.
This film is satirizing those "wage workers" who don't care about the public at all and only start from their own interests.
We are also alerting us not to blindly believe in authority, they say that just for the sake of working and making money.
View more about Thank You for Smoking reviews
