Well, I admit that both are films that "ask questions", neither have answers.
The director's focus is of course "can't ask for". As for why you choose to raise this question with the theme of the same sex, it will be more powerful to arrange such a story to happen to two men. Snooping, staring, frantically rummaging through the garbage that no one could throw away, sneaking into his room to pee on the bed, and kidnapping him out of the bed in a horrible black rubber tights. If it were a man and a woman, I'm afraid it would directly let the audience fall into the imagination of crime. But when these criminal activities happened to two men who were indifferent, the shape of "can't beg" came to the fore. The use of same-sex themes is only a means, not an end.
The director likes dogs very much. This film does not have any soundtrack, but it is full of all kinds of dog barking. The first shot is the protagonist's dog. In the end, the protagonist ran wild in the form of self-imposed exile, and choosing to live like a dog also seemed to be regarded as a manifestation of redemption. The main focus of the perspective was on the protagonist's actions of eating, drinking, pulling, and throwing.
The title is for fun and has nothing to do with the content of the article.
View more about O Fantasma reviews
