How to evaluate a movie? This is a question that has been frequently pondered over the past year. For Slam Dunk, all I can say is that it's a commodity, not a movie. Some people may say, how do you measure commercial films by the criteria for judging art films? I think you are of inferior quality, and you are still madly kidnapping 70,000 to 80 million here.
Zhu Yanping stated before the release that he is not good at making art films, so it is not bad to make a few idol dramas to fool around. People always have to eat, so there is this "Kung Fu" + "Shaolin" The combination of "Football" + Japanese comic "Slam Dunk" has no imagination at all. Are you thinking of paying tribute to Zhou Xingchi? Are you still paying tribute to Guo Jingming?
In the arrangement of the story, the plot is also relatively simple. In order to pursue family and love, a boy from a martial arts school gained friendship in the process of practicing basketball and thwarted the conspiracy. Then there are many old and very plagiarized bridges interspersed among them, which are pieced together through a bunch of big-name powerful actors. Of course, there will be a lot of exposed holes in this kind of movie, which cannot stand scrutiny, and there is no need to scrutinize it. If you ask the people around you while watching the movie, it is estimated that he will be annoyed by you, because many of them are really disgusting.
The lineup of actors is very prosperous, not to mention Jay Chou, Chen Bolin and Cai Zhuoyan, the three idol groups, Zeng Zhiwei, Wu Mengda, Zeng Jiang, Liang Jiaren, Huang Yifei, Li Liqun, Wang Gang, and Huang Bo and Run Ni, etc. These are all acting skills. party characters. But the majority of young people like to be cool and handsome, hehe. Ruining these old comrades.
The stunts are mediocre, the storyline is mediocre, the music photography is mediocre, and only commercial interests last forever. Identification is completed.
Ruined kung fu and ruined basketball.
View more about Kung Fu Dunk reviews
