Only the strong deserve to fight back

Celestine 2022-03-11 08:01:30

Anti-war films are always the Versailles literature of historical victors. Saying so may touch the sensitive and fragile nerves of literary and artistic youth. Perhaps there is no army that is not afraid of death, but the weak and the defeated have no chance to fight back even if they are afraid of death. U.S. Vietnam, is Vietnam qualified to be anti-war? Armenia, Azerbaijan, is Armenia eligible to be anti-war? NATO, the FRY, is the FRY qualified to fight the war? The weak are not afraid of death because they are forced to help, but if they are afraid of death, they will really die. The strong can reflect against war and not fight, while the weak have no choice. If our works of literature and art are not brave and fearless, not fighting wolves, but anti-war, then it is a bastard who can stand and talk without back pain.

View more about Valley of Tears reviews

Extended Reading

Valley of Tears short comments

Robin 2022-04-20 09:02:48

Mossad's propaganda film showing the enemy's weakness and weakening vigilance? How could such a group of selfish, fearful, timid, neurotic, tactical rabble win the war? ! The general is nagging, avoiding, all kinds of complaints and suspicion. The tank battle at the beginning and the end is okay.
Hester 2022-04-24 07:01:25

It's the first time I've seen a war movie with so much nonsense still look so good. Everyone in the film is arrogant, and those with positive shots are basically talking. Shooting guns (literally, tank shooting guns) are constantly talking. People are talking all the time, but they just look good. HBO is only good for making chatty movies, such as Sex and the City and Game of Thrones, and action movies like Westworld (why are you pretending to be...), it's not good to look at the thunder and rain.