I don't mind saying that Mission Impossible is a bad movie. I give a three-star evaluation, one is to take care of the series, and the other is to take care of the reputation of the big director.
This is a commercial film. If you want to find your own position, maybe the director didn’t want to understand one thing. The audience sitting in front of the screen can’t understand his performance and his thoughts. If the director holds such a mentality, he will be superior. Making a movie, the effect will be very bleak. One is not popular, and the other is that the audience's evaluation is not high. The reason is that everyone's understanding of Mission Impossible has a universal value. It lies in spy warfare and suspense, not in literature and art, not in slow-paced lyricism; in the genre itself, The spy war movie does its job well and satisfies the audience's expectations. Don't let the spy war plot serve the director's own sentiments. Making a movie is for the audience to see, not for the audience to understand your sentiment and interest.
I feel bad. This is very vulgar, and it is also unacceptable to popular audiences. How can a great director make a bad film? These are two different things, and big directors can make bad films as well. There is a benchmark of Mission Impossible 1 ahead, which makes people feel disappointed. The sequel 2 slipped so much on the grade. The first is the arrangement of the story. The first multi-angle and high-quality, the audience will regret that they did not concentrate on watching the movie and missed the wonderful plot. Each roll of film is precious, the story is compact, the rhythm is light, and it is fascinating. The second part is completely a pseudo spy film, with a slow rhythm, a long narrative, and a quiet style, mixed with the boring and literary boring taste of soap operas and literary films. The emotional drama runs through the whole movie. It is reasonable to say that the emotional drama cannot be larger than the main line of the storyline, but the result presented has the meaning of the whole movie attribute, love is greater than the spy war.
Of course, to admire the courage of the great director, it is very stressful to make a movie under the premise that the first movie is popular. Under the peak, seeking the peak again is a test for the director and producer. China pays attention to the first suppression of the desire to promote, or the first suppression of the desire to suppress. In fact, it does not lie in the order, but in telling an ordinary fact. It is extremely difficult to maintain peak output. What is often encountered is one high and one high. Low is the normal life, and so is the movie.
View more about Mission: Impossible II reviews
