A few days ago, a classmate suddenly informed me that there is a movie "Smeared Bird" with special aesthetics, which is highly praised. Thanks a lot for sharing.
Regarding World War II movies, it seems that various perspectives have been used, and there are not a few children's perspectives. However, there are very few that appear in a partial art form and have a high degree! The artistry of the film is a perfect bridge between conventional and pure artistic expression, such as the bridge between conventional films and Beratar's "The Horse of Turin" genre! Usually, whether it is movies, paintings, etc., realistic presentation will make people intuitively feel the author's intention to express, and it is easier to see the author's skill and ability. This kind of subjective discussion can effectively give the author's views on things and draw out the audience's approval or dissent. If handled well, it will be praised for a long time! But not art films! It is easy to confuse art films with literary films, it is not the kind that is easy to understand and not acceptable to the public! Art will relatively allow a few people who can understand or understand a little to discuss meaningful things! Two days ago, I accidentally met a painter, and someone asked him to judge and comment on the paintings in his collection. Because I don't understand, I don't feel any sense of his sharp judgment. But then he briefly expounded his understanding of art. He believes that art is not random abstraction or "different". Art must be a new perspective that has never been seen before. It leads people to a bright and great perspective. Open people's perspectives and present them in a supernormal state that people recognize today! The meaning of art must be extraordinary! And appear in a completely different field! Picasso is, Van Gogh is, Jobs is, Musk is, Qin Shihuang is... and so on. Or, with enough height and understanding, would you be too?
View more about The Painted Bird reviews
