Ten years ago, watching "Inception" in the theater really gave me an unparalleled viewing experience. The exquisite structure made people hooked, but after a few years, I was fortunate to watch the more surprising "Red Pepper" ", when I went back to the second version of "Inception", I was deeply boring, and it was far less attractive than the former. It is pure coincidence or similarity, whether it is a situation that often occurs in literary or film creation, the routines are similar, but the packaging is different.
Humans’ ability to compose stories seems to have reached a bottleneck and limit, and now more sensory stimulation is used to cover up the flaws and lack of scripts; in addition, ignorance is not only a major weapon mentioned in the film, but also easier to obtain in reality. A prerequisite for happiness and fresh perception. It’s like you vow to become a writer, but when you read more and know more, your desire to write will be greatly reduced. In the long history of history, many themes and ideas have actually been written out, but It’s just not being seen, and for the same reason, the more you watch, the fewer movies that stimulate you.
I personally prefer Nolan’s early works, especially his low-cost debut, "Follow", which is a blockbuster; the design of playing time and space and narrative structure creates ups and downs of suspense and unexpected surprises. It has always been Nolan movies. The core and key points of the game, but after the "Inception", the cart is turned upside down. To tell the truth, I don’t like it too much; Nolan seems to have stepped away from his advantage step by step, and is more and more inclined to commercial mainstreaming, which is highly anticipated. "Creed" is even more seriously derailed. His unique skills have gradually been relegated to second place, replaced by a variety of overwhelming soundtracks and seemingly cool and actually quite redundant action scenes.
Before the release, I heard that this film was very brain-burning, and I also sat in the front row to watch it more intently. After watching it, I was a little confused, especially the final melee. Later, I thought about it carefully. It is actually playing time in general. The heroic tone and sentimental elements of saving the world have become more intense. Like "Interstellar", it is packaged with a tall theory that makes people look like a question mark, and with leap-forward editing, it seems to be out of the popular ranks and promoted to the advanced ranks. The actual singing is still very common. The main theme.
Time is nothing more than a three-part composition. Past, present, and future, one advances and one retreat, breaks the barriers between the three, interacts and participates in each other, constitutes a time difference and simultaneous time. With an amazing rhythm and frequency, the audience is brought into an unpredictable situation. Similar causes of incomprehension often show the director’s awesomeness or pretense from the side. On the contrary, "Creed" shows Nolan's opportunism, which is like he only needs to easily play a little skill that he is good at in the past. It seems to be able to shoot. A good movie praised by everyone, what I saw was not Nolan’s wit but a blunder.
There is a classic line in the film: Don't try to understand, try to feel it. Just yesterday I saw Vinci’s interview and talked about feelings. The feeling can also be said to be atmosphere. The creation of sound and pictures has a fascinating effect. It talks about how to use perspective, scheduling and color, and how to make the finishing touch. It takes a lot of thought to achieve the desired result of the soundtrack, that is, the audiovisual language. Looking at "Creed" again, there is no intriguing sound and picture concept in my mind after reading it. It is like a glass of boiled water, which stirred up a little wave in the final stage, but it was really dull and tasteless.
Welcome to follow | Public account: yuchishangjiu
View more about Tenet reviews
