Nolan has overdrawn his previous credibility this time
After finishing the "Creed" in the zero-point field, it can be concluded that the people who watched the movie earlier repeatedly said that it was not a good thing to say that it was not a good thing to say that it was not a good idea to watch Fellini Kubrick. ——It's just too complicated. This kind of complexity is not an advantage when I first brushed it. It is because Nolan has not dealt with the problem of information capacity well.
So I do go to see the second and third brushes to understand the logic inside, but you have to ask me, I think this is Nolan's Waterloo, and it is not recommended to watch the movie.
If you want to go to IMAX to experience the explosion of audiovisual, that’s ok, but as for Nolan’s film, the concept this time has good points and some very old-fashioned (because of the complexity and complexity), and the themes are very old and sometimes Some authors are ingenious (but also very old-fashioned), and at the execution level, he probably spends all his thoughts on real shooting. It is true that the audiovisual is very explosive, but the degree of integration with the plot is very general.
High-concept and strong execution have always been Nolan’s two strongest strengths. To be honest, there are some cheating in high-concept this time. Strong execution is really unsatisfactory. The form is greater than the content, the form is empty, and the content has not been implemented. It seems that he himself has been involved in logical error correction, but because of his ambition, there are still a lot of unexplainable places-of course, I am going to sort out this and I am not sure now.
The second is that his previous shortcomings have been infinitely magnified, such as the boring and boring emotion processing, but this time emotions have to be dealt with very importantly. Then dropped the book bag, all kinds of information jammed. Many of the previous advantages may also be overdrawn. This time it is not amazing, it is just neat.
The current public opinion continues to hope that he can create more glories after he is appointed to the gods. In fact, I think he messed up.
This is my overall evaluation. Next, I will do some inventory of what I can do now based on the information I know, and I will add it after the second review.
The trailer inspires anticipation
I believe no one has watched the trailer without looking forward to it, because reversing this visual concept is really exciting. Especially Nolan, who has also filmed "Amnesia", "Fatal Magic" and "Inception", gives people the feeling that he may be better than we imagined, mainly because the plot is brain-burning and creative. Let’s talk about this trailer first. What do you expect after watching:
Before I talk about expectations, I have to mention a sentence that Nolan repeatedly emphasized: He is not shooting time travel, but reversing time and space. After watching the complete film, I will give Nolan a soul torture: Are you mentally bad at saying this? ...Speak slowly after this.
After reading the trailer, I think my expectations are roughly like this. First of all, there is a crisis in humanity. The black protagonist is an agent who wants to save the world. The problem encountered was that the secret service organization discovered the time reversal. For example, when the hand stretches out the bullet and turns it backwards like yours, instead of throwing it out, you look dumbfounded, and then the female scientist tells you, don't think, but feel it.
What I immediately think of is the cool version of "Avatar"-a crisis occurs, the protagonist enters a different world, in this other world, he has to adapt to the reversal, and win as hard as a game, just like "Avatar" Manipulate this creature in Pandora, so there are particularly cool and difficult points to manipulate. But in short, the protagonist has adapted and saved the earth. At the same time, he will complete the transformation himself. For example, in Avatar, faith is retrieved, and the creed may be the tragedy of the loss of the beloved, huge loss and so on.
In Avatar, it’s an alien planet, and here may be a parallel world, very similar to ours, but it must be reversed. This is a certain expectation I have based on the forecast. I think it must be at least like this, just like " In Inception, it’s not about dreaming, but about how to make a game. It’s just that this game applies a lot of dream theories, so everyone is happy to upgrade.
But because it is Nolan, I expect him to give more things, but at least it should be of this level.
——Based on this setting, in fact, we will immediately talk about a specific timing of the idea of "reversal".
In "Inception", Inception is actually not a real dream. There is a machine that can implant the world made by the dreamer into the brain, so that the brain subconsciously thinks it is a dream. Everyone can understand it at first glance, because Nolan performs A lot of interpretation and analysis, he added a girl dream maker role, she kept asking, the audience kept updating the information, it was synchronized immediately, full of pleasure.
In "Interstellar", Nolan is lazy, which makes the audience's participation lower, but still draws a picture to explain to us the folding, including the visual presentation of the five-dimensional space. These concepts are quite in science fiction. It's old, but it's so exquisitely presented in the movie.
But "Creed"...I'll talk about this later.
Let’s continue with the trailer. My assumption just now does not consider time. In other words, the reversal is a bit like a certain function in the game. You fight the enemy and you are defeated. So you can reverse the time by turning on a device, and then You just change to a different style of play to win-in fact, the result is different from before, but the protagonist has an on-hook function like in the game. I originally thought so, so I said this may not necessarily be what the audience wants. It's more commercial. Nolan is obviously more ambitious, so he has to answer the question of time posed by the reversal.
The reversal comes from time reversal. Why is this? After the reversal, can the result of this reversal be changed?
——You know how others will answer you when they punch you, and then you beat him in advance. This result is different from before. Is there any effect? Can this influence be adjusted automatically by time or directly change the future, and this change is equivalent to time travel, is it foreseen before the reversal occurs, or has the result changed?
Didn’t everyone look dizzy? But it is about answering these basic questions, so I look forward to it very much while watching the trailer.
A good trailer hangs our expectations so high, and finally we start to see it as a movie:
It’s not that you don’t understand the film, but why you need to understand it
In front of the film is an entire spy film, and I even joked about it. When filming 007 as a black man, the opening scene of the story is very visual. A group of people in the opera house wants to kill an undercover, and throw bombs to kill the crowd at the same time. The protagonist, the black man, leads everyone to save his colleagues, and at the same time he wants to go back and throw away the bomb to save the innocent people. After the protagonist was rescued, he was arrested and interrogated between two trains. It was too late to swallow the poison. A colleague in the front had already died-we know that this colleague is the protagonist's partner, Twilight Man. The protagonist resisted for a while and finally dizzy.
Wake up the protagonist is still alive, the boss talks to the protagonist, it turns out that all this is a test. The protagonist retreats, the boss said that you are the person we are looking for, everyone else has betrayed the organization, you have held it, you are now going to save the world, and at the same time the boss made a gesture, crossed his hands and clasped his fists, saying that this is the creed , You are really recruited.
So the protagonist began to approach the secret slowly, and he was taken to meet the identity of a female scientist, here is a bit of a parody of 007's Dr. M, you see, 007 is looking for a male geek scientist, Nolan will look for a female, and the protagonist will look for it. It's black...
The female scientist shows the protagonist some props that can reverse time and space. If you throw the bullet, the bullet will reach you. The protagonist was utterly shocked, and he immediately asked the sentence, which is a reversal. Does free will still exist? ——This sentence is the key point and needs to be tested.
The female scientist can't answer anything. In short, they have found a lot of these reversible props. The female scientist reminds the protagonist not to think about it, but to feel it-this is not the original force of "Star Wars"? Isn't this the highest martial art of my martial arts movie?
At the same time, the female scientist expressed that our planet is going to die, so you have to deal with it. How it's done is related to these reversals. There is not much explanation here, and then everything in the picture, the protagonist has already done it in this organization. He first went to India to find the arms dealer who saved the important nuclear-related hard metal (like pomelo) in the theater. So he found a partner, Twilight Man. As a result, Twilight Man was very difficult to fight, and the two cooperated tacitly.
This is where Nolan started to play visually cool. Obviously, the protagonist is already a bit familiar with these reversal tools. The two took off to blackmail the Indian arms dealer and discovered that the real boss behind the scenes was the arms dealer's wife. The Indian female arms dealer talked to her a lot, basically means you want to know what's going on, you have to get a more terrible arms dealer, that is, the villain of the story.
The male protagonist took the job and went to see Nolan's Queen British Grandpa, that is, Leonardo's father-in-law in Inception.
The old man is not a professor this time, but a nobleman who eats expensive steaks. He ordered the protagonist to find an arms dealer who grew up in a nuclear-contaminated area. This person has something to do with the reversal.
The old man suggested that he start with the emotionally broken wife of the arms dealer villain. The protagonist also teased me that it's not that handsome guy 007 can't do this job. The old man said that you are less stinky and beautiful. Renbaifumei is engaged in art auctions. She has a handle for her husband to catch, that is, she may be greedy for money or for other reasons. She sold a good painting, but the fake painting was her. My husband bought it to blackmail her. If exposed, she will be unemployed and may go to jail. The most important thing is that she has lost the custody of her son, who is her life.
So the protagonist took the lead, dressed like a dog to fight the relationship, the heroine recognized him. But the protagonist's words touched the heroine, who has been eager to escape from this relationship, but her husband is full of thugs, and she can't leave. Who let the protagonist be able to fight, the heroine began to ignite hope.
In order to make the heroine willing to help the protagonist, the protagonist has to go to the private warehouse of the rich man built at the airport to help the heroine destroy the painting. Of course, the protagonist also wants to find the secret of the arms dealer.
The old rules, the old partner Twilight Nan cooperated with the execution, thinking about the idea of letting the plane directly rush into the warehouse, and the execution was successful. Nolan emphasized that this was all real shots and I burned a lot of money.
On the other side, the protagonist and his partner have sneaked into the warehouse and entered the secrets of the arms dealer. It turned out to be a spectacle device that can hide people. The two of them just wanted to open it, and suddenly two people with strong skills came in, one was fighting the protagonist, and the other ran away-later we know that the time machine can come to the past, but this time machine has a strange characteristic after passing through it, that is His reaction was reversed- dear Nolan, did you make us funny when you said that there is no time to travel? Isn't this the time travel setting? Just add a bit of reversal.
The action is considered a failure, and the protagonist is a little dazed, so he continues to follow the line of the arms dealer's wife.
The details will not be expanded. In short, the jealous arms dealer began to introduce the two protagonists through his wife to catch up with each other. And although the protagonist did not have sex with the Bond girl like 007, the protagonist also began to sympathize and help the heroine, although it was initially used-I had to complain about this period. Nolan has always had a problem with his relationship with these emotional lines. The filming is real, as far as he thinks it's okay, the audience should be insensible.
In particular, we all feel that these may be very important plots, which have made a huge contribution to the subsequent reversal, so we will look at it carefully. In fact, it is really boring. Up to now, it is difficult to convince the protagonist why he wants to take the risk to save the heroine. This set of shooting methods is very old-fashioned, and Nolan is not good at it, but the plot must be the saviour of the heroine as the key, I am really convinced.
In short, this villain, arms dealer is not simple. He controls his wife and suspects that the protagonist participates in the transaction and sells arms, but in fact he is also using the protagonist. Before looking for the protagonist, he brought back a nuclear weapon-related device in the theater, which seems to be called pomelo. Here are some scenes that are so embarrassing that I really don’t know how to evaluate them. For example, the heroine attempts to kill the villain, the protagonist stops, and the protagonist threatens. The hostess, let's go, it's awkward anyway.
In the end, the protagonist finds that the villain is cruel, and he knew what the reversal was all about. The protagonist of the uranium device finally knew where he was, so he once again found a good partner to design a theft plan. Several large trucks blocked the opponent's car and then stole the device.
The action was successful! But after stealing the villain, he threatened the device with the heroine's life, and the protagonist finally gave it. In the process, they also encountered a car that had been chasing them backwards, but they didn't explain it in any case.
The protagonist jumps into the heroine's dangerous car and saves the heroine. It turns out that the protagonist has changed things. At this time, the villain came and tied them for a while, and took the protagonist to the room with the function of time travel.
Here Nolan once again made a visual wonder. The two rooms are separated by glass and divided into forward and reverse directions-here I will explain in detail, otherwise it is easy to not understand.
Simply put, this is actually a time machine that can be traversed.
After you travel through the past, for example, a few minutes before the past, but your behavior becomes reversed, the world is normal, and you reversed.
The villain tied the protagonist for a while, and then went to the other side of the room to threaten his wife. The protagonist was afraid of his wife's accident, so he told the specific device. But the angry villain still wounded the heroine, and the heroine was dying.
Here we need to add another setting: if the bullet passes through the human body, and after you pass through it is reversed, the bullet can go back and you can live.
But if you are reversing your journey through the past, and you shoot in the forward direction, the bullet cannot be reversed because the person who was shot was shot in the forward direction. She would have to die—in fact, I think Nolan forced this paragraph, like the story is not round. There are a lot of the latter, not that I can’t understand, but I really feel confused.
The villain has now worn to the past to grab the device, and Twilight Man is obviously not simple, bringing a large group of people. The protagonist feels that he can't trust this partner anymore. Some things are hidden from this partner, and some have been popularized. Basically, they also rely on this machine to come from the future, in order to help the protagonist-here I actually feel that the setting is a little bit I can’t keep up, it should be a time machine in the future, but it’s not necessarily a time machine in the future. Reversed. But there is another reversal machine? Reversal after crossing? The logic here is weird.
In short, what the protagonist means is that I can't let the heroine die. At the same time, I went through to prevent the villain from grabbing the device.
So the partner’s colleague shared with the protagonist a bunch of aspects that you need to pay attention to that you pass through.
The protagonist went there, presenting a set of visual wonders, and we also knew that the car that the protagonist was following was actually himself. But after tossing around for a while, the protagonist still didn't grab the device. After he passed out, he found that his partner was also here. He took the hostess and brought the hostess to the airport warehouse, where there was a device that could save her life if she reversed it—I’m going to the toilet here. Actually, there is some information. I really can't keep up, so I have to go to see the second brush to make up.
Then began to popularize the worldview. Simply put, the villain has a story. The villain is the person appointed by the future man to help the future man-what is it like, "Ring Messenger".
Although the partner Twilight man is also from the future, he clearly instructs the villain's future man to be more future. In that future, mankind will no longer work, global warming, environmental pollution, and the future man is about to die-what do you think of? "Interstellar" is the crop failure. Human beings have to fight in the universe because of the wormhole. Later, they succeeded by a pair of father and daughter. However, there is no wormhole in "Creed". People in the future feel that they have to come back and find an algorithm device. .
I'm going to get my head here, just sort it out briefly. Anyway, I mentioned entropy before, so let's skip it. Simply put, in the future, a female scientist will develop this kind of reversal device, which can calculate everything or what (whether it is a reversal machine or a measuring machine). Disassemble this device into nine parts and put it in a place where nuclear weapons are kept, so that no one else can find it and it will not harm humans. But in the future, because human beings in modern time and space don't cherish the environment, they will be finished. So I simply picked a subordinate, the villain, through the time machine, and helped them find this algorithm machine for work, and gathered nine of them, maybe it would work hard to do a miracle.
The story of the villain is also wonderful. He grew up in a nuclear-polluted environment, suffering from a snack, and receiving gold from the future. He cheered up and became a hero-this setting is really like "Loop Messenger".
Over the years, he has collected all these algorithmic devices. Of course, he knows how to reverse. But because he himself had been exposed to nuclear radiation for a long time, he had cancer, and he didn't want to live anymore. He is going to bury himself with the current human beings... This setting is not pleasant to surprise, and unexpected is not unexpected. Anyway, it is very messy, because you use a time machine, whether the future people know or what, it is not clear.
In short, the main task of the protagonist is to combine with the large forces, mainly to snatch the nine pieces collected by the villain, and not to fall into the hands of future people and villains. At the same time, the villain is still useful and cannot die casually. But the female chief is single-minded about revenge.
Here is another important principle to introduce, that is, when you travel through the past, at the moment of reversal, you can actually change the past more or less. That is, you can not pass the time you have experienced, but this is very easy to be a butterfly effect, because you change the past and then change the future, the specific situation is not clear, it is the grandfather paradox- Nolan, you are really embarrassed to say that you did not make time this time Cross?
This is what the protagonist just found out about the reversal: Does free will still exist?
If it is a reversal, isn't everything destined?
But as long as you cross over, you will actually find that you can change. But whether the protagonist, the partner, including the villain, are deliberately not changed. Because they are afraid that changes will affect the entire future, the earth will accidentally become extinct, so it is not destiny, but they are choosing. This may also be the theme Nolan wants to talk about.
Why is the villain also abiding, because after all, he is the person chosen by the future, who is considered a vested interest, so he also abides by this principle.
In short, the decisive battle is this group of fighters, a team from the near future, working with the protagonist and partner, using the machine of reversal, to form two teams against each other. Play one pair first and reverse it again, so that the other pair can see the process and the result, and then it is easier to win, which is a cheating play.
Here are all kinds of big scenes.
On the other side, the heroine went through to find the villain, trying to let the villain commit suicide and destroy the world. But the heroine didn't hold it back and killed the villain herself, she couldn't bear it anymore. This is actually two lines. One follows the time reversal rule, and the other actually changes the result. But in fact, her change did not ruin the world. Because the other line won, they got the device.
The guy in the near future said that everyone would die after seeing the device, but after thinking about it, he let the protagonist and partner go. Through the details, the protagonist discovers that the partner is actually the person who came to help him in the near future. If there is any memory, it is the colleague who was killed when the protagonist was on two trains. This partner has been saving the protagonist, and the protagonist can't help but talk about who sent you.
The partner said: You elder brother. You taught me in the future.
The protagonist is a bit sentimental, because no matter the protagonist or the partner, they all know that the partner will die at that position on the train sooner or later. Everything seems destined, but they still have to defend the earth-this paragraph is definitely true "Terminator"!
So under the sentimental feeling, the protagonist began to understand his mission and dealt with the Indian female arms dealer who was critical to the heroine. He can no longer go to the heroine (it seems that they already have feelings for them). The heroine guards her son, and the protagonist, because of what the partner said, he has to slowly recruit the creed team, abide by the rules of time, and slowly defend the earth whose reversal crisis is brought about by this device. The protagonist glanced at the heroine leaving- this is the plot of "Mission Impossible 3", but the story is suitable for all ages, but the story is really too complicated.
Nolan’s popcorn doesn’t take the audience to play
Finally, I got a lot of plots for the first time. I went to the bathroom for a few minutes in the middle, and maybe I missed the key points. I waited for the second time to make up for it.
So now that I have finished speaking, can you understand my disappointment?
In fact, the story is very complicated, but plainly speaking is really just a complicated popcorn movie. He took a 007 according to his own aesthetic taste. I'm thinking about the second brush I can probably see that the detailed logic settings inside are reasonable. But very awkward and uncomfortable.
When it requires audience participation in many places, he jumps over it through fast forward and music bombardment.
In terms of advantages, there is no doubt that it has an interesting main setting, but it is time travel, brother! It's just a crossing with reversal. Reversal is a gimmick, and crossing is the essence.
If you tell this story again, it will be another version of Interstellar. People in the future will be over because modern humans don’t cherish it. They traveled through time and space to find that algorithm device. This device was built by a scientist in a day and can be used to reverse it. People in the future expect this to change the world or directly The people of the world are extinct, come to protect the earth...
As a result, the crisis occurred. The current human organization sent a bewildered protagonist to slowly discover this process. If the protagonist encounters a partner who is divinely assisted, the apprentice he recruited in the future will come to help. At the same time, the protagonist does not perform the task. Be careful to fall in love with the heroine, the heroine is the wife controlled by the villain constantly PUA-these are the things...
In the end justice defeated evil, and the two heroes understood each other’s sentiment and mission. They were not destined, but chose to defend the earth in this way...So this is very popcorn, but the gimmick is very complicated. Nolan seems to deliberately refrain from time travel. It was he himself who forced the imagination of a reversal. No one has done a reversal, which is amazing. But carefully pondering whether some of the settings in it are really reasonable, makes me very entangled.
For example, to reverse traverse, you need to inhale reverse oxygen, and it will freeze if it catches fire. So I am curious whether eating shit is reversed or normal...
Like the concept of Inception in "Inception", he actually said relatively simply that the U.S. Army invented the dream-making machine, but there is a time machine in your reversal. Can your logic really be smooth? Although you mentioned the grandfather's paradox, once there is a time machine in the story, there must be a very strong explanation for exclusiveness.
Here, I think the big setting Nolan may use is about the concept of a science fiction novel by Liu Cixin, "Collapse", that is, the universe collapses, time will reverse, and all changes are meaningless. Nolan may have made this big setting, and then emphasized that fate comes from the motif of choice.
But the combination of this motif and this concept, to be honest, is completely filled with a lot of other information, all kinds of inexplicable elements dominate the audience.
The whole story, maybe everyone is due to Nolan’s status, and a bunch of people who sound like a lot of people repeatedly tell you about entropy, which makes you very dizzy, thinking that there must be a threshold-please, since he is this body A large number of movies are sold at the box office. You can be cool, but you must be simple and straightforward for people to enter. I think the current capacity of the plug can be used to shoot a trilogy. The concept itself is very good, but Nolan executed it very hastily.
He added too many things he wanted to express, or what he wanted to play. He performed three missions, bombing airplanes, and playing cars in the real scene. But in fact, the core plot advancement does not need these big scenes. To be honest, you really think it has an impact. ?
In "Inception", there is a little girl who will keep asking questions, let us follow into the plot, including the dream is really cool to play in this way. Because Nolan found a game or a movie that is very similar to dreams.
But there is no such little girl in "Creed", and the creator blindly believes that the audience should follow. Why?
Generally, art films have deep thinking and they have thresholds, but it is not necessary for movies to play physical concepts as connotation thresholds. Then I really might as well watch "A Brief History of Time". There are not so many gun battles and emotional dramas that I have to endure. .
In other words, this movie is very unfriendly to the audience. I think Nolan has had this problem since the filming of "Dunkirk". Because it was a World War II movie, it is a time concept that everyone can accept. But a brand-new concept is proposed, and you can learn by yourself in this way, but the topic summarized is to discuss the fate of your own choice, a big story about a hero saving the earth. What is worth learning?
The creators started to be lazy in creation, constantly thinking about the pleasure of shooting. This may be a trace of the exhaustion of creative power and slowly being praised.
In the past, it was necessary to carefully retain the communication with the fans, but now it has completely become a dream of oneself. He can also make very obscure movies, such as "Amnesia", but there are actually a lot of things that are worth predicting, but "Creed" really doesn't have a lot of things that can be grasped, but the visuals are very fun, the whole is popcorn, can't tell clear.
From the perspective of the big concept, it is actually a very interesting concept, but Nolan did not implement it well.
The reversal of the small concept is just a visual breakthrough. I think it is difficult to justify it. In fact, the logic is smooth from his point of view, but why should we look at this logic and what the audience can get? I think it is a problem.
It's like fighting with yourself in the middle. Actually, this concept is really very old and very old. The last one to hit the street was Ang Lee.
This is from a conceptual perspective, but the concept is always good.
Then the execution is terrible.
To put it simply, the shooting is actually really good. The sound effects are quite annoying this time, especially when the plot is just like this, so many and complicated.
If we jump away from these complex concepts, this is a story about creation heroes, right. A person who organized an organization, how he awakened as the founder of this organization, this concept is really too mainstream, not good or bad, it's medium.
But how did he execute it? We don’t know the background of this character. We only know that he is loyal and not afraid of death. He is very flat. Then he established a brotherhood with a partner when performing the task, and discovered that this brother was taught by himself in the future, and because of the common belief in this brotherhood die. It's not too high, but it's medium-meeting the old daughter and the young father in "Interstellar" is completely different.
Then the most disastrous place appeared. When the protagonist performed the task, he was suspected to have empathy with the heroine, the villain, and it could be love or not. In this section, Nolan shot really badly, really badly, really badly!
His shortcoming is that this kind of normal feelings are very warm, which is very difficult to accept, which has already been sacrificed for this woman.
But the focus of the narrative this time is really driven by this feeling, so it is really unsightly.
At the same time, this story is a bit like the double-kill nemesis of 007 in "Danger in the Sky." Mrs. M has cultivated 007 and an evil son.
In fact, the villain is a very charming character. But it's actually very boring.
He grew up in a disaster environment and was chosen by future people to become a hero. But I decided to die together because of a terminal illness, but it didn't happen. During the process, his feelings for his wife were very pua, but the reason is actually not clear. It feels that the characters are being used as puppets by the director.
In fact, the character becomes more attractive and the story is better, but there may be too many things Nolan has to say to deal with.
In "Batman Episode 2", the Joker surprised everyone. Then "Batman Episode 3" actually everyone knows it, boring, so it's a revolution.
If I insist this time, I think it looks very complicated, it is the level of "Batman Episode 3", it is Nolan's own carnival, and his character's emotions have exposed a very boring side.
Let me talk about this first, and I will go to the second brush today and sort it out.
In short, I feel that this time exposed Nolan's main problem, he has not improved, or tried to improve. But his magic weapon is almost used up, he must really carefully sort out and reflect.
His shooting ability is undoubtedly getting stronger and stronger, but the story is really...
Of course, I always feel that Nolan did not implement this idea well this time. For example, the American drama "Edge of Crisis" has also tried this, and "Creed" has been re-made, at least everyone is still very interested in making games.
I think Nolan is getting old too. After this article is posted, I am ready for various attacks.
Actually I am a Nuo fan, but I don't think this movie should be praised, it's good for him. And the domestic box office should not work.
Come on, the next one.
View more about Tenet reviews
