After watching this video. One of the insights is: public power must use civilized means to deal with animals, instead of righteous indignation against animals. If that happens, then public power will become beasts.
In the film, the innocent teenage victim is in a painful psychological struggle or undergoing a painful operation. The scene changes to a more comfortable interrogation room, but the murderer is sitting there eating pizza, drinking Coke, and asserting that his finger Due to being splattered and scratched by fragments of the victim's skull, it should be treated. The lawyer had no choice but to be "professional and decent" and embarrassed to remind Jingcha that "my client should rest", "my client should take care of the wound", etc. Jingcha also came up and put a band-aid on the wound. . The murderer was also very perverted "elegant", "polite (cultured)" and said thank you. Yes, the psychological impact of this contrast on the audience, any person with a conscience will be angry and itchy, wishing he could rush to tear this beast to pieces. But sorry, private rights, whatever you do is OK. But public power, we can't be like Yemen, we can't use a stone to kill the young girl between the walls, we can only shoot or inject. Although I absolutely agree with stoned to death (but, what if this person is wronged? Yes, here, the strange argument of wronged and not wronged is still discussed, because its influence on the psychology of spectators is not the same) but The advanced ones of those civilized countries are not discussed here. Only discuss the matter itself. Personally, I advocate heavy punishment, but after reading the case of one of the five Nordic countries in the most advanced region in human history, my thinking is: each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Perhaps, all we can do is describe the facts
View more about 22 July reviews
