I don't like watching traversal dramas because the logic is not clear.
I decided to take a look at this drama and saw the third episode.
I know I haven’t been able to see the whole picture, but the missing Mickey returned to 33 years ago and was taken in by his adoptive mother. 33 years later, he hanged himself when he disappeared when he was a child and wrote a letter to his mother. I shouldn’t have this line. Are you wrong?
In other words, Mickey knows himself when he was a child. In other words, Mickey can completely prevent him from disappearing when he was a child, or at least not at that point in time. Then, what will happen?
Mickey changed the situation where he went back to the past when he was a child. What will happen to him? ? ? How to resolve this paradox?
Can this play explain it? If he can explain, then I have to look at it. The pace is too slow, I really don’t want to see it insulting my IQ in the end...
If you can't explain it, isn't this so-called brain burning all nonsense? Everyone played the script inexplicably, and then went back and forth, making me exclaim the magic? It's too fake.
View more about Dark reviews
