This movie was Amway on Douyin before. It seems that I haven't seen an Indian movie for a long time, so I took time to watch this movie. I can only say that the Indian movies I watched before are all kind of inspirational. Yes, it may also be that I watch less Indian movies, and I finally learned what Indian dramas are. The main reason is that this movie is still relatively popular on Douyin, and I can't understand it. First of all, I think this TV series is okay in the suspense part. This is undeniable. After the bone marrow transplant, there will be two kinds of DNA in the same person. I think it is the key to this movie, and he For the cruelty of the murderer's childhood and after growing up. The ferocity of serial killers, or the evil look in the face of Indian girls, I think it is quite acceptable. So I think I can give at least three stars in terms of the plot setting, but I want to complain that there are some things that I think are really incomprehensible in the movie. Let me say it again, I was puzzled when I started to read that there will be two kinds of DNA in the same person after a bone marrow transplant, so I googled it, it seems that after the bone marrow transplant, because the bone marrow is the function of hematopoiesis, so The blood produced in the body may have different DNA. Of course, I'm not quite sure about the exact answer, but there will be such an answer when searching, so I believe that such a setting that there are two kinds of DNA in a person's body is relatively reasonable. It seems to be in the previous domestic suspense drama. There is also such a scenario. For this double-setting of DNA, I still have conservative opinions, maybe more professional people will have more professional answers. There are several points I want to complain about this movie. The first one is that I know that the official language of India is English, so maybe most Indians still speak Hindi. In the movies I watched before, the main language was actually Hindi, but In this movie, the male and female protagonists will suddenly mark a paragraph of English with an Indian accent, and then return to Indian after a while. If they speak English in some work, I can still understand it. Like Hong Kong, English is a different language. It is an official language, but especially when the heroine is half English and half Indian in a sentence, I am very confused. What kind of setting is this? The second point is the most incomprehensible part of this movie. Has India's science and technology reached such an advanced stage? To detect a person's DNA, as long as he touches something, he can detect it. Note that this is not the case. Fingerprints are DNA. At first, I was skeptical about the detection of the prisoner's DNA on the chocolate wrapper. Could it be that as long as the murderer touched the chocolate wrapper, the murderer's DNA could already be mastered? So in the later episodes, I also paid special attention to this point. When the forensic doctor wanted to collect DNA samples of other people on the scene, he just handed the pen to the other party. , so that the police can obtain each other's DNA? All I can say is amazing! ! I remember that some articles on the Internet also mentioned DNA detection. At least in our country, DNA detection needs to detect human hair. For hair such as saliva and nails, hair is hair, and it cannot even fall on the comb. It must be collected on the spot. , or that it has to be cut from human hair. Then there is a question. India's science and technology are so developed now that they don't need these hairs, and things like saliva only need to be touched with a hand. You can imagine the crime rate in India. As long as everyone registers their DNA in the country, India will be a completely crime-free society. Think about it, if a person kills a person, as long as the murderer's DNA can be extracted from the victim's body, there will be no burglary, because the crime of burglary will inevitably leave traces in the victim's home, Even just touching the doorknob can detect DNA. What crime is this? In this movie, it is said that the police are so skilled that they can extract DNA as long as the murderer touches anything. I really really don't understand about this. As for the long-haired boy mentioned in the third story, the long-haired boy with the hearing aid, I remember it seems to be called Reuben. After being caught by the police, there was no plot of the boy confessing his guilt. Satan asked me to send them to the machine just based on the boy's words. So the police believe the boy is the murderer? I would like to know what are the standards they identify? Is it too sloppy, and it seems that the Indian police in this movie are completely incompetent, have no logic in thinking, or do nothing more valuable at all. And point 4, which I would say. How did the police know the murderer was the boy killed with a remote Bluetooth-controlled hearing aid? I can understand that remote bluetooth is a relatively advanced technology, but I want to know how it controls hearing aids. I remember that some classmates who had problems with their ears also wore hearing aids. Is this kind of hearing aids so advanced that they can be connected to Bluetooth? Or the audio signal received by the hearing aid is different from the normal sound wave. Then the Bluetooth remote control, anyway, always feel that these two things cannot be connected. In the movie, the police are so sure to define the matter, the remote Bluetooth-controlled hearing aid murder. Or you can imagine, is there such a scenario, a criminal group uses a remote Bluetooth system to control all the students in a hearing-impaired school and train them to be secret killers. When necessary, just remotely control these deaf students via Bluetooth. All can receive hints with command meaning, and then form a group to kill. Think of what a grand plot this is, a school for the deaf instantly turned into a training ground for killers. If it is a hearing aid with remote bluetooth control and added bluetooth receiving function in the plot, I may still understand a little, but the police in the story is really so absolutely certain that the murderer used remote bluetooth to control a boy with ear problems of hearing aids. And not to interfere with the reception signal, but to receive prompts with verbal content, thus committing suicide. Or you can think about the kind of Hong Kong and American action movies in the future that don't need any bugs hidden in your ears. It is simply to give the other party a sign to recognize themselves, just pretend that the deaf person is wearing a hearing aid. If you pretend to be a group performing for public welfare, even if the other party finds out, you just need to pretend that you can't hear it. When the other person sees the person wearing a hearing aid, it is better to dispel suspicion than the other person sees that he is wearing a wireless Bluetooth headset. Another point, I don't think this is a rant, just my own perception, because many literary works have a lot of descriptions about the low status of women in Indian society, and even now in some news reports, a lot of The social status of women in Pinghu, India is also very low, but after watching this movie, I suddenly feel that the current Indian society may have a relatively clear caste class, for some high caste classes, or some Families with relatively wealthy financial conditions actually love girls more, and there is no obvious contempt for women, so the whole world is the same, as long as you are rich enough, preference for boys over girls is such a phenomenon does not necessarily exist. Whose child? who baby. Even in places like India where the status of women is generally low, as long as your family is rich enough and your caste is high enough, girls can live very well. To complain a little more, why does the hero have to choose a car when he deals with the murderer at the end, and the hero has to drive by himself. Isn't this putting yourself in a very passive state, you can't park the car, or even park in a relatively secluded place, isn't it bad to have a showdown with the murderer? You have to drive the murderer to a corner. I just want to know what the main character thinks. Or that he had premeditated, just wanted to know that the car accident would kill the murderer. That's not right, what if the murderer is too cruel? The most important thing is that in this movie, the male protagonist finally kills the murderer by undoing the other party's seat belt. Is your product, your careful product, very similar to the one belt, one helmet policy advocated by our country now? So I really can't understand the thinking logic of the Indians. The stunt of killing the other party is actually to untie the other party's seat belt. Last but not least, this movie seems to me in a very confused state. why? Because Indian men really look very similar, and because I don't watch Indian movies often, I may not be familiar with the actors, but I have seen very similar male protagonists, male supporting characters and murderers. The only difference between them really is the length and thickness of the beard. If I change the beard noise, I feel that I can't tell them apart at all, so the reason why this movie looks very tired is that I don't know which is the protagonist and which is the murderer, and I have to go back to the thin film. It may also be that Indian movies are not in the same form as other countries' movies, so I can't say anything, but I think the above points are where I want to complain. Of course, he also has some well-set plots. , such as his suspenseful and brutal description of the killer is still good. It’s okay if you follow the current situation or a popular recommendation, but if you really like suspense dramas, I don’t think it’s necessary to watch this movie, because you will find that other complaints are far from over. The suspenseful part.
View more about Forensic reviews
