An empathy between man and bird

Scarlett 2022-03-26 09:01:03

According to Zizek's understanding of the book, the bird in the film is a capitalized phallus stained with the real world's imagination, which is transformed into the pleasure of the maternal superego, and the transformation is that the mother of the child is "deprived" (as Lacan put forward the symbol of the phallus (that is, the son), one of the three structures of deprivation in the Oedipus stage; and the entry of the bird from behind the camera into the frame, which turns the objective vision of God into the quintessential subjective gaze of the murderous flock of birds. And it is assumed that the flock of birds is not part of the narrative reality before entering the frame but adds to the sense of fear around the viewer. Clips: 1 Panoramic medium shot close-up of dead bodies Triple shot 2 Gas station fire heroine portrait stop-motion puppet-like shock sight from different angles Mismatch between betting footage and footage of the fire fighting back Mental confusion and shock effects 3 The perfect shot of "Signs" and "It's too late". Before the sparrows poured into the house from the chimney, the three shots were from long to short. The heroine opened her lips and stepped on the second shot (subjective) A bird from the perspective)'s tail is used as a voice-over to make a short, redundant, and silent shot with a lag, and the third is ushering in an explosion

Elsa 2022-03-25 09:01:06

Hitch and his dog walk through the scene, the only bright spot. Are those flocks of birds an early green screen special effect? I wanted to watch it as a comedy but it was too boring. What I may want to express is a consistent style of repression, a sense of closure in the secret room to avoid the ferocity of the outside world. The dog blood plot has nothing to do with the future of mankind. By the way, those two centrifugal acacias are really cool fun.