I think if our lives are also measured by time on our arms, will the direction of each of our lives change?
In this order, why are the people in the slums unjust? Why don't ordinary people resist? Because it will die, but if you want to overthrow an order, you must have a certain sacrifice, depending on the mentality of this group of people. Obviously, they chose to abide by order and live forever under the oppression of the rich. I always feel that this film must have his historical significance, but I don't know much about history. Can't give a very professional and formal answer.
At the end of the film, showing the heroism of that "era" in the form of male and female robbers still feels a little improper. Because it is too idealistic just to save the world with two people.
The special thing about the protagonist is that he has a human heart of compassion. When they are robbing the rich and helping the poor, ordinary people in the slums still sell others for personal gain, which makes me feel like "the mud can't support the wall". At the end of the film, the poor people cross time zones and are too excited to affect the social order. It does not mean that they won, and it does not fundamentally change this poor mentality. Therefore, helping people in slums in this way will not really help them. Because their thinking is too backward, some kind of spiritual support is missing, and some kind of power to be awakened is missing.
View more about In Time reviews
