To be honest, I wasn't very interested in this movie at first, maybe it was the Indian movie that gave me a relatively fixed impression?
Until I saw a film reviewer said that the movie has a lot of twists and turns, which attracted me, so I spent more than two hours watching it.
At the beginning, the movie tells the story of a boy who was beaten by his father since childhood. In such an environment, the little boy was unusual since he was a child. He likes to collect animal corpses, and even in bloody scenes, he can pick up the corpses without changing his face. part of the collection.
He always smiled , and in the end, the young man killed his father with a smile and buried the body in front of the house, with the meaning of collection and hatred.
Soon, the disappearance of the little girl Divia attracted public attention, and her body was found immediately. As the case leader, female police officer Lydika found another case very similar to Divia's case. She applied to her superior to set up an investigation team, and the police station assigned her a forensic consultant - Samuel. Also the younger brother of Lydika's ex-husband.
Samuel has a unique set of methods for investigating cases. He has an extremely keen intuition. When the police were still confused and searching for the murderer, he boldly proposed the conjecture of "child serial killer" and proved it.
Samuel can always rush in front of the police and know more clues about the murderer . His thoughts are very bold, and there is no so-called secular bondage. He can guess the murderer's behavior based on clues. Lydica initially dismissed his suspicions, but a witness soon emerged who confirmed the killer was an eleven- or twelve-year-old boy.
Eleven-year-old Reuben entered the police's sight. With witnesses, Reuben became the wanted object of the police. When Reuben was eight years old, he was taken to a psychiatrist by the police for pushing two boys into a well, and Dr. Jayakumar took over Reuben's treatment.
In the eyes of the doctor, Reuben was always confused. He didn't look like a bloodthirsty and cruel monster , so he accompanied Reuben for two years, but in an accident, Reuben fell ill again and fled.
On the other hand, a retired old criminal policeman brought a DNA sample , which came from the Myanmar Gang case ten years ago. A "third-person DNA" was found on the victim .
This case was the first case handled by police officer Lydia. She quickly captured Ubaid, but the old criminal policeman believed that the murderer was still at large, so he had been looking for it for so many years.
Unfortunately, Ruben's DNA does not match the "third-person DNA" .
Samuel had a strong interest in the Burmese gang case in those years. Through the narrative of the old detective, he decisively used instruments to detect the buried stone scene. Sure enough, under the ground, there are five corpses that have not yet been excavated. As the investigation progresses, more and more clues show that there is an inseparable connection between the Burmese gang case and the serial murder case of children today.
When Reuben was captured, he pleaded guilty. "It was I who brought them to Satan's altar with my own hands," he said.
Smart Samuel discovered the abnormality of Reuben's confession. Because Reuben's hearing was abnormal, he must always wear a hearing aid. When he confessed, his head was turned to one side to prove that he should have heard something. Samuel believed that someone had brainwashed Ruben by interfering with his hearing aid. This discovery allowed Samuel to get in touch with the people behind Ruben step by step, and even discovered that Lydica's missing daughter Naya was not dead, but was taken away by the real murderer.
Samuel learned from Ubaid's mouth that there was another person. The murderer killed Ubaid and blamed the kidnapping on Samuel. Samuel used the video to escape the testimony. He bravely asked the real murderer, Alphonse, the boy who killed his father at the beginning of the film . He learned the truth from Alphonse's mouth. In the end, Alphonse died in a car accident. Lucky to survive.
some doubts
1. After watching the whole film, the male protagonist Samuel is like a god . Any small detail can be interpreted differently by him. For example, the chocolate wrapping paper in the trash can of the hospital, the police locked Ruben, but he suggested that this may be the interference of the murderer; another example is that he perfectly reproduced the murderer's behavior through the traces on the little girl... Such a detective ability It is comparable to a detective, but he is only a forensic consultant, and the police officer Lydika has always been skeptical of him, indicating that before these cases, he did not seem to have such a powerful ability. Then why in this case, he suddenly shines brightly, and his speculation about the murderer never goes wrong?
2. Why did the murderer Alphonse take Lydica's daughter Naya? Just to get revenge on Lydica by making her a serial killer?
3. Samuel asked the murderer Alphonse to come out and explain to him that he had discovered the real murderer, so Alphonse told him his story to us as well: the broken family and the cancer died soon after he was young. The perverted Alphonse woke up again and began to kill children, only to be discovered by his son, who fell and fell in fright. From then on, Alphonse only had revenge in his heart. Then the male protagonist untied the murderer's seat belt during the fight with the murderer, so the murderer died without evidence, just like what Ubaid wanted Ruben to do after Ruben confessed at the beginning - let Ruben bear all the sins .
The final scene of the police officer's trial of Samuel is the same as that of the police officer at the beginning (that is, the one who lied that his wife was killed by others and that he was knocked unconscious). The police officer lied. Can such a similar scene be understood as Samuel Er also lied?
View more about Forensic reviews
