Proletariat of the world, unite!

Sedrick 2022-03-16 09:01:03

The working class in the film is really not a very positive image, and there is no prominent representation as the expression of the image of the workers. It is true that the working class has always not respected individual heroism, but the film is actually oriented.

As for the workers who can be named, George is one, and the foreman who controls the main machine is also one. The former completed the important mission of letting the protagonist, the rich second-generation Fred, experience life. As for the task that Fred gave him, it was long since thrown into the clouds in the flyers of the Yoshihara Club. But this short ten-hour grassroots experience allowed Fred to complete the transformation from the bourgeoisie to the working class, and finally united with Maria to fight for workers' rights, although this transformation was short-lived after all, and the result of the struggle was not long-term. plan.

"Father, father, is the ten-hour work that never stops like this?"

The bearded foreman who controls the main machine is more like the leader of the workers (different from the instigation of the evil Mary), especially in the second half of the film when the workers want to destroy the main machine, the foreman warns people that destroying the main machine will lead to the whole When the dungeon was flooded, and when all the workers were revelling, he also reminded people, "Where are your children?" Here I have to say that the workers in the film are chaotic, have no opinion, short-sighted, forgetful, and are eager to seek the will of the leader rather than seek it. truth itself. Mechanical labor has almost alienated them into inhumans, except for the sincere and hopeful light in their eyes when listening to the preaching of the Virgin Mary, or the fanatical affection when they were instigated by the evil Mary, all other times they were stern, His eyes are empty, his steps are consistent, and he walks mechanically with his head down. Here I can't help but think that the scientist Robert King said that if I give me another 24 hours, I will make the robot no different from the real person. I habitually think that it is to make the machine keep approaching like a human, making it more and more humanized, but thinking in reverse, Why can't it be that people are becoming more and more robotic?

The bourgeois characters in the film, the Fredersons, are even more interesting. Fredson, the big capitalist, is an exploiter in the underground worker city. The workers work for 10 hours without taking a break.

ten hour clock on the wall

But at the same time he sent his son Fred to the dungeon to rescue the workers and their children, and he could have just kept him there. He is ruthless and can fire subordinates without changing his face, even if he knows he will go underground to work endlessly after being fired. But it is not really cold-blooded. He is infatuated with his late wife Hale, and loves his son Fred. This actor is also well-chosen. His eyes are deep and melancholy. He doesn't look like a cruel exploiter. I can't help but praise this character for being so handsome, even more so than his son. Fortunately, his son Fred has the same beautiful eyes. I still don't understand one thing about this character. Fredson said that he wanted to incite a violent revolution through the evil Maria, so as to "conquer violence with violence". Naturally, there is no such plot at the end of the film, nor does he reveal his army or Other means of violence, I don't know how he wants to "control violence with violence". Moreover, the destructive power of this revolution is too great, I don't know if the consequences are also in his calculations, the outcome is not as he expected, and I don't know what it should be according to his assumptions.

The face is also charming

Fred has completed the transformation from a second-generation ancestor who only knows how to eat, drink, and play to a bridge that prompts workers and capitalists to shake hands and make peace. I don't know if the driving force of curiosity is too amazing or the power in love is too great. The film I see now is a restored version. It is very old. Maybe the performance at that time was very exaggerated. Coupled with some dropped frames, Fred's actions are always very dramatic. It seems to be a love scene, as if a kiss is about to happen in the next second.

Finally, Maria, who plays the role of a disseminator of theory and advocates peace rather than violence, but as we all know—revolution is impossible without bloodshed. The initiator or instigator of the revolution in the film is the evil Maria, and it is not difficult to see that the director does not advocate resolving class contradictions through revolutionary means. The result of the revolution in the movie is also a piece of chicken feathers, and finally the flood flooded the entire dungeon. It is true that destroying the machine will not bring liberation, but making peace with the bourgeoisie will never escape the fate of exploitation. Revolution needs the guidance of scientific theory, and neither Maria can play this role. Fear of the holy Virgin Mary, or the evil Mary who bears the seven deadly sins, has never changed the fate of the exploited, and of course, they have not thought about it subjectively.

I thought the device could control the water, only to attract more and more people.

As a sci-fi film, the imagery is also amazing. The design of the android Hull is really ingenious, which reminds me of Sora Yamaki's paintings

Hull
Sora Yamaji's Marilyn Monroe

Fred entered the dungeon for the first time, saw the explosion and hallucinated, thinking it was the machine that devoured the workers, and that hallucination reminded me of an album cover by Travis Scott

Fred's hallucination
Travis Scott

"The regulator of the hand and the brain is the heart." The film ends with Fred, the middleman, making peace between the working class and the bourgeoisie. It is a very utopian ending. However, we know that the contradictions between the working class and the capitalists are irreconcilable, and the basic contradictions of capitalist society are antagonistic, which cannot be solved by the original system alone. Of course, neither can the moderate reformers, and can only use revolutionary means. . The image of the "heart" in the film is also a kind of good expectation, a humanistic concern in the industrial age, and a fiery emotion in a cold machine.

Proletarians of the world, unite!

View more about Metropolis reviews

Extended Reading
  • Elda 2022-03-23 09:01:39

    #Archive# The restoration version of the second brush is a magnificent and rich masterpiece, which is both socially critical and commercial and entertaining. After all, it is produced by the country that gave birth to "Das Kapital", and it is the cover of "The Great Movie" after all. The animal story of the ancient society, the machine alienates the mind; the saint banshee is a white and black swan, a doppelganger with two bodies on one side; the sci-fi design is advanced, and it has influenced countless generations. There are differences in the quality of the deleted frames that were recovered, and I feel that at least four cuts will seriously affect the plot: the relationship between the capitalist dad, the mad scientist and Hel; the dresser can't help but tempt to go to the nightclub (human nature); secret The detective went to the middle-class home to inquire about news to buy him (the villain and "Chang'e in the Moon" are the same person); and most importantly - was the door of the core machine opened by request/violence? The foreman is telling the truth, you fools, didn't you ruin your job by destroying the machine? The construction machinery design of this film can be contributed to #fascinating or frightening giant silent object#, the strange variation Marseillaise of the group riot is very meaningful.

  • Alia 2022-01-27 08:06:45

    The regulator of the brain and hands must be the heart. The words themselves are correct, but nesting in the context of capitalism is entirely just as a representation of capital stylization (even using the Tower of Babel fable), and finally the male protagonist acts as an intermediary to reconnect the working class and the bourgeoisie, declaring violence to the working class The impossibility of revolution, the dictatorship of a few elites was sent to the bourgeoisie, and both sides found a suitable position in it to achieve the balance between classes required by society. But behind the seemingly happy ending, lies the premise that capital has alienated people: the working class is reduced to a mob, so it resorts to religious beliefs, eager for apocalypse to bring the prophesied "regulator" and achieve liberation; the bourgeoisie Behaving fragile and sensitive, he threw himself into the mechanical myth of steel in order to grow, and at the same time used its "anti-enlightenment" to paralyze the public (and self). But from another perspective, society is waiting for a few "awakened" among the capitalists to lead the masses (where are they going?), with a hint of utopian socialism?

Metropolis quotes

  • The Machine Man: [disguised as Maria] Leave the machines - ! Let them race to their death -! To the Heart Machine - !

  • Joh Frederson: [Talking on a video phone] Open the gates! Open the gates, I said!

    Grot - the Guardian of the Heart Machine: If the Heart Machine is destroyed the entire machine district will end up in ruins - !