I spent the weekend at home and spent the price of not watching CPA quickly finished. I don’t know if it is because of the relationship of the first season or the tight budget of the crew. I feel that the plot clues have been severely compressed, and the already complicated branch clues have become more tense. ..and in the end a lot of bugs may be debugged in later seasons.
I only talk about my views on the main line. The deepest feeling is that the whole show doesn't know what Sean is doing. I wanted to win over Lale to initially build my empire, but it turned out because of the festival between Lale and Asif, and it was a unilateral festival (because Asif scalded Lale's own husband, but Asif didn't know that his subordinates had feces Lale's husband), the result is that Lale's drug-dealing was messed up by Asif not long after, because Asif moved big cake.
This little guy Sean said that he didn't do due diligence when looking for "ally"? He also took the lead in touching other people's cakes casually, and then shot Ed in the family meeting later, which directly pushed himself into the abyss, and the family began to officially part ways. It was really sad to see Sean hid at his own construction site and didn't dare to go home. It reminded me of the late Qing emperor Puyi watching the Forbidden City in Beijing and couldn't go home? The resources and capital operated by the good older generation reached him like this, and he even blew up his own house.
Sean went from a bloodbath camp to messing with Huang's family's business, then breaking with the Ed family, blowing up his newly built building, and finally being shot to death by Elliot. At least on the surface, Sean's character in the first season is basically It's negative, and I have the determination to resist, but I always feel that my heart is not enough, and I don't know if the plot is specially arranged to facilitate the follow-up Jedi counterattack, because some people guess that Sean is not dead in the end.
There are still a lot of Game of Thrones stalks in the play, including Marian's death, which reminded me of the bloody wedding in Game of Thrones for a second, but Aunt Cat is pretending to be shit this time hhhh. The fights and gunfight scenes in the play are still very shocking, including the bloodbath of the Gypsy camp and the encirclement and suppression of Gypsy children by mercenaries, as well as the bloodbath of the employees of the investment company owned by the Wallace family by Nigerians. The scene is really enough. burst.
Through the development of the whole drama, I still think of some well-known gangs in the old society in China, and the operation of gangs from the early stage to the later stage is the same, that is, the famous Mr. Du Yuesheng Du, who started out through the bloody struggle between gangs The victory in the gang struggle at that time, and then the establishment of its own financial institution to use the financial market to operate capital is highly consistent with the play, and finally evolved into a capital struggle.
In the end, Floriana picked up Marian who was pretending to be dead. It should be the strategy of Wallace and the Dumani family, as well as the survival of Billy, Finn's illegitimate child and other key figures are likely to be the next season's ruthless characters. Investors and the gangster family who have been suppressed and planned to fight back, who will be killed in the end, all this is worth looking forward to!
PS: Was it a bit too hasty for Sean to get his lunch in the first season? After all, it took a season to build the main character. If there is no reasonable explanation for the next few seasons, it is really unreasonable. Even if Sean is resurrected, there must be a good reason?
View more about Gangs of London reviews
