My goddess Zoey mentioned this very shocking documentary in her introduction video. When I first heard this name, I thought it would be a record of a huge flood that has already happened, full of grand scenes and everyone's determination to face the disaster and rescue the victims. Like many medical documentaries that depict the full course of infectious disease events. But obviously, this film is not in this way. What we are looking at is the laws and ugly faces of the human and capital world. When Leonardo was inside the helicopter, he said, "My carbon footprint in the past two years may have been larger than many others." He was reflecting. Just like the theme of this film, I think the production team and the scientists behind it also hope that everyone will reflect on it. . Even if we are just ordinary people, unable to decide national policies or change the way companies produce, we are part of one of the most powerful but also loosest groups in the world, the "people". Warming is not the rise in global temperature as most people understand it, eg: ice from melting Greenland ice blocks the heat transfer of the Gulf Stream and Europe will cool. In the US, the petrochemical companies, as one of the economic hegemons, can fund many high-sounding puppet organizations to protect their property in every way possible, including climate science denial, which is truly staggering. In their eyes, as long as they have the capital, no matter how bad the earth is, at least in this era, they can still live comfortably until the day they die. In business, they are successful. As for the distant descendants and the rest of the earth at present, it is not worth mentioning compared to the immediate desires and ambitions. James Forward, like the right-hand man of many fossil energy companies, has infiltrated legislation in Congress to interfere with the response to climate change. I just don't understand, is the human conscience easily shaken in the face of money and interests? I have never faced such a huge temptation. But if there is, I think I'll be terrified, and when I lose the bottom line, I know I'm going to fall into the abyss. Will they be afraid? Or do they feel they are not at fault? When I saw Trump said in his speech that the greenhouse effect does not exist, and said he felt cold on the spot, I didn't know if it was "American humor" that I couldn't understand, or if he was just ignorant, or if he really had no conscience. I still have domestic news that I can remember, and there is definitely a section on smog and air quality. When a singer went to Beijing to hold a concert that year, because of the poor air quality in the area, the cough continued and it had to be cancelled. It seems absurd, how can people continue to live in a city where even the air is harmful. Breathing is such a basic life requirement, and sometimes it is only when you feel sick that you feel dizzy due to hypoxia. But after recovery, I will never be grateful to breathe freely because it is so normal. It is such a common thing that one day it will be destroyed and become a rare state. Of course, optimistically speaking, the way of human existence will also change to adapt to these, but I don't know how to change, will we "evolve" into another kind of human with low oxygen demand? China's efforts have been recognized, with 9,000 factories online data, public scrutiny, Chinese media regularly discussing climate change (of course this is not enough), public support for China's green growth policy, and the rapid progress of renewable energy replacement. It's true, we see it in our own eyes. (But there's a parade in there, eh? There's been a parade?) That's a good thing. I dare not say how superior our system is, but compared to a country where capital dominates everything, I always feel that we have an extra line of defense for public power. In addition to the existence of Aamir Khan, India is really difficult for me to have a good impression of, whether it is the caste system or the status of women, it makes people feel very barbaric. But I also saw their helplessness in the impact of changes in the world environment. Although India has the third largest carbon emission in the world, it still lacks electricity, poverty and dense population make them helpless. 300 million people do not have access to electricity (equivalent to the entire population of the United States), and the development of coal mines is naturally more economical than energy use. While India and China have both invested in building solar facilities, the US has little to follow. Climate change is urgent, real, not fictional. in ABAIANG, KIRIBATI, the flood has entered the freshwater lake, the island will sink, the government is adopting a dignified immigration policy (the people who buy land in Fiji choose to emigrate or not). Small island countries have the least impact on environmental change, but bear the first serious impact of climate change, but who can save them. Rainforests have always been called "green deserts", but this is too harsh, and its role is really underestimated. If the rainforest is there, and you can't grow cash crops or make money, for so-called developers, it's really a desert. And for the global climate, it's really important, as any teenage kid knows. The Indonesian government is one of the most corrupt in the world (dare to say it), corporations bribe officials to get permits, 80% of Indonesia’s forests have been burned, and animals have lost their homes. From the helicopter, it was all gray. The land is used to grow cash crops and to refine palm oil, an inexpensive oil often found in cosmetics. The ability of rain forests to absorb carbon has been greatly reduced, while burning and deforestation has also greatly increased carbon emissions. Many people may not know that cattle are also the culprit of greenhouse gases. Cattle raising is the least resource-efficient activity, and fodder cultivation occupies a large amount of land. In comparison, the cultivation of fruits and vegetables for human consumption occupies only a small amount of land (but here is one point, corn is not also one of the staple food raw materials for human beings). One? Are all the feed occupancy part included in the calculation here). Cattle produce the greenhouse gas methane, each molecule of methane is equal to about 23 molecules of carbon oxides. Ten to twelve percent of methane emissions in the United States come from cattle, 1/2 lb. Burger=200hours of 60w lightbulb use=24hours of window air conditioner use=42miles of driving a prlus. I don't want to buy milk and eat beef anymore...but the cheese milk cap...my favorite is woohoo. In the future, try to eat Chinese dim sum as much as possible, just forget the cake. Fortunately, there are a lot of people working on it. Paris climate change agreement reached. But it has no mandatory provisions, no mention of a carbon tax (tax increase/tax transfer), and joint action needs to continue to progress. I was surprised for a long time that I interviewed Mr. President here. Obama has faced resistance to his climate-change policy, and his previous efforts could be unraveled if the next leader denies climate science, but Obama trusts the public perception because it is a fact. But it now appears that he has underestimated the destructive power of Mr. Trump. Climate issues are also national security issues, wars, riots, and competition for resources are all related to climate change. In fact, according to the U.S. system of government, leaders should do what the people like, and the polls will be good. That is to say, when the people start to change, the president will change, and the views of the people will change, and the president’s views cannot be opposed. So it has to go from bottom to top. The Pope called on the international community to embrace modern science on climate change. No religion in history has ever done anything like it. But this is not absurd. Philosophy and science are not entirely in conflict. I have always believed that the ultimate idea of religion (not counting cults) is to exist for the highest ideal and the greatest happiness of all mankind. No matter what religion it is, or where it originated, it is to teach people to be kind and to get along with others. , getting along with nature, and if science can be used as an environmentally friendly means, there is nothing wrong with it. The Pope called on the international community to embrace modern science on climate change. No religion in history has ever done anything like it. But this is not absurd. Philosophy and science are not entirely in conflict. I have always believed that the ultimate idea of religion (not counting cults) is to exist for the highest ideal and the greatest happiness of all mankind. No matter what religion it is, or where it originated, it is to teach people to be kind and to get along with others. , getting along with nature, and if science can be used as an environmentally friendly means, there is nothing wrong with it. The Pope called on the international community to embrace modern science on climate change. No religion in history has ever done anything like it. But this is not absurd. Philosophy and science are not entirely in conflict. I have always believed that the ultimate idea of religion (not counting cults) is to exist for the highest ideal and the greatest happiness of all mankind. No matter what religion it is, or where it originated, it is to teach people to be kind and to get along with others. , getting along with nature, and if science can be used as an environmentally friendly means, there is nothing wrong with it.
View more about Before the Flood reviews
