Shown in the form of a novel, using a large number of narrations to describe the plot and the direction of the characters, and finally the happy ending as we expected, the obvious settings such as the left hand, cigarettes, and the same sportswear make people feel that this is a dramatic performance. .
Wes · OCD · Anderson did not use a lot of lateral movement and strict composition in the early days, making people more focused on the bright but non-saturated tones of the film.
The character setting is similar to that of "Crossing Darjeeling". Both adopt the setting of three brothers/sisters. From deviating to understanding, he also tried to tell everyone that his parents are not completely right. Long live the understanding, on the other hand It is the character setting, "genius" and "rich" are more similar.
Chas is a child who is very good at doing business and suing his father. He grows up under such pressure as he hates his father. The child may also hate him in the future; Margot is a bathtub queen with all the rebellious characteristics, maybe because of finding a real family and integrating The family is unsuccessful; Richie is a tennis player whose family is too bright and repressed. Even if he has a father's preference, he is still vulnerable; Royal is more like a real life game player, although he failed to the point of being sued by his son for divorce and bankruptcy; Eli was a Attached to the Tenenbaums family or a genius novelist with addicts, Clair is a neurological research writer with his own insistence, Etheline is an archaeologist like a mother, Henry is a relatively loyal lawyer...
Contradictions, the ability to catch the audience's attention, it's all a piece of shit when it happens to anyone, anyway, embrace it, that's probably what Wes Anderson wanted to tell us.
View more about The Royal Tenenbaums reviews
